Structural and functional MRI data differentially predict chronological age and behavioral memory performance
Joram SochiD, Anni RichteriD, Jasmin M. KizilirmakiD, Hartmut SchützeiD, Hannah Feldhoff, Larissa FischeriD, Lea Knopf, Matthias Raschick, Annika Schult, Emrah DüzeliD, Björn Hendrik SchottiD
Abstract
Human cognitive abilities decline with increasing chronological age, with decreased explicit memory performance being most strongly affected. However, some older adults show "successful aging", that is, relatively preserved cognitive ability in old age. One explanation for this could be higher brain structural integrity in these individuals. Alternatively, the brain might recruit existing resources more efficiently or employ compensatory cognitive strategies. Here, we approached this question by testing multiple candidate variables from structural and functional neuroimaging for their ability to predict chronological age and memory performance, respectively. Prediction was performed using support vector machine (SVM) classification and regression across and within two samples of young (N = 106) and older (N = 153) adults. The candidate variables were (i) behavioral response frequencies in an episodic memory test, (ii) recently described fMRI scores reflecting preservation of functional memory networks, (iii) whole-brain fMRI contrasts for novelty processing and subsequent memory, (iv) resting-state fMRI maps quantifying voxel-wise signal fluctuation and (v) gray matter volume estimated from structural MR images. While age group could be reliably decoded from all variables, chronological age within young and older subjects was best predicted from gray matter volume. In contrast, memory performance was best predicted from task-based fMRI contrasts and particularly single-value fMRI scores, whereas gray matter volume has no predictive power with respect to memory performance in healthy adults. Our results suggest that superior memory performance in healthy older adults is better explained by efficient recruitment of memory networks rather than by preserved brain structure.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Age-related differences in fMRI subsequent memory effects are directly linked to local grey matter volume differences
Jasmin M. Kizilirmak, Joram Soch, … Björn Hendrik Schott·Neurobiology of AgingPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2023
- Functional and Structural Brain Age Gaps as Complementary Predictive Markers for Cognitive Performance
Annachiara Crocetta, Marta Morandini, … Matthieu Gilson·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2026
- Whole-brain connectivity during encoding: age-related differences and associations with cognitive and brain structural decline
Elettra Capogna, Markus Handal Sneve, … Dídac Vidal-piñeiro A·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2022
- Single-value scores of memory-related brain activity reflect dissociable neuropsychological and anatomical signatures of neurocognitive aging
Anni Richter, Joram Soch, … Björn Hendrik Schott·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2023
- Openness to experience is associated with neural and performance measures of memory in older adults
Christopher Stolz, Ariane Bulla, … Anni Richter·Social Cognitive and Affective NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- What underlies exceptional memory function in older age? No evidence for aging-specific relationships to hippocampal atrophy and retrieval activity
Anders M. Fjell, Markus Handal Sneve, … Kristine Beate Walhovd·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2024