Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
PolySTest: Robust statistical testing of proteomics data with missing values improves detection of biologically relevant features
Veit SchwämmleiD, Christina E. HagenseniD, Adelina Rogowska-WrzesińskaiD, Ole Nørregaard JenseniD
Abstract
Statistical testing remains one of the main challenges for high-confidence detection of differentially regulated proteins or peptides in large-scale quantitative proteomics experiments by mass spectrometry. Statistical tests need to be sufficiently robust to deal with experiment intrinsic data structures and variations and often also reduced feature coverage across different biological samples due to ubiquitous missing values. A robust statistical test provides accurate confidence scores of large-scale proteomics results, regardless of instrument platform, experimental protocol and software tools. However, the multitude of different combinations of experimental strategies, mass spectrometry techniques and informatics methods complicate the decision of choosing appropriate statistical approaches. We address this challenge by introducing PolySTest, a user-friendly web service for statistical testing, data browsing and data visualization. We introduce a new method, Miss Test, that simultaneously tests for missingness and feature abundance, thereby complementing common statistical tests by rescuing otherwise discarded data features. We demonstrate that PolySTest with integrated Miss Test achieves higher confidence and higher sensitivity for artificial and experimental proteomics data sets with known ground truth. Application of PolySTest to mass spectrometry based large-scale proteomics data obtained from differentiating muscle cells resulted in the rescue of 10%-20% additional proteins in the identified molecular networks relevant to muscle differentiation. We conclude that PolySTest is a valuable addition to existing tools and instrument enhancements that improve coverage and depth of large-scale proteomics experiments. A fully functional demo version of PolySTest and Miss Test is available via http://computproteomics.bmb.sdu.dk/Apps/PolySTest.
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 52
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Field percentile
- top 10%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- AlphaPeptStats: an open-source Python package for automated, scalable and industrial-strength statistical analysis of mass spectrometry-based proteomics
E. Krismer, M. T. Strauss, M. Mann·bioRxiv·Mar 10, 2023
- Missing values are informative in label-free shotgun proteomics data: estimating the detection probability curve
Mengbo Li, Gordon K. Smyth·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2023
- proDA: Probabilistic Dropout Analysis for Identifying Differentially Abundant Proteins in Label-Free Mass Spectrometry
Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze, Simon Anders·bioRxiv·May 1, 2020
- Accounting for longitudinal peak quality metrics with MSstats+ enhances differential analysis in proteomic experiments with data-independent acquisition
Devon Kohler, Eralp Doğu, … Olga Vitek A·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2025
- Quantification and differential analysis of mass spectrometry proteomics data with probabilistic recovery of information from missing values
Mengbo Li, Simon A. Cobbold, Gordon K. Smyth·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2025
- PEPA test: fast and powerful differential analysis from relative quantitative proteomics data using shared peptides
Laurent Jacob, Florence Combes, Thomas Bürger·BiostatisticsPeer-reviewed·May 25, 2018