PANACEA: a framework to maximise genetic diversity in genome-wide association study meta-analyses
Abstract
There have been recent efforts by the human genetics research community to increase the genetic diversity of participants contributing to genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of complex human traits and diseases. The traditional multi-ancestry GWAS approach is to first assign participants to continental ancestry labels based on their genetic similarity to individuals in reference datasets. Ancestry-specific GWAS are then conducted separately for each continental label, the results of which are aggregated through multi-ancestry meta-analysis. However, with this approach, a participant may be assigned to an ancestry group that does not reflect their personal view of ethnicity/race or may be excluded because their genetic ancestry is not sufficiently similar to individuals in reference datasets to be assigned to a single group. Here, we present a novel pipeline (PANACEA) for fully inclusive multi-ancestry meta-analysis that employs a continuous and multi-dimensional representation of ancestry that maximises the genetic diversity of GWAS. Through application to multi-ancestry GWAS of type 2 diabetes susceptibility and simulations, we demonstrate that the inclusive pooled analysis provides equivalent protection against population structure to a traditional ancestry-stratified analysis but, importantly, offers increased power to detect association through increased sample size by not excluding participants with outlying ancestry. The pooled inclusive analysis also enables assessment of ancestry-correlated heterogeneity in allelic effects without the need to assign participants to continental labels that may not sufficiently reflect genetic diversity within ancestry groups.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating Multi-Ancestry Genome-Wide Association Methods: Statistical Power, Population Structure, and Practical Implications
Julie‐Alexia Dias, Tony Chen, … Haoyu Zhang·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2025
- Multi-Ancestry Meta-Analysis yields novel genetic discoveries and ancestry-specific associations
Patrick Turley, Alicia R. Martin, … Benjamin M. Neale·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2021
- The PAGE Study: How Genetic Diversity Improves Our Understanding of the Architecture of Complex Traits
Genevieve L. Wojcik, Mariaelisa Graff, … Christopher S Carlson·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2018
- Impact of cross-ancestry genetic architecture on GWAS in admixed populations
Rachel Mester, Kangcheng Hou, … Bogdan Paşaniuc·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2023
- Multi-trait GWAS for diverse ancestries: Mapping the knowledge gap
Lucie Troubat, Deniz Fettahoglu, … Hanna Julienne·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2024
- Admixed Populations Improve Power for Variant Discovery and Portability in Genome-wide Association Studies
Meng Hsuan Lin, Danny S. Park, … Christopher R. Gignoux·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2021