henhaobio
Sign in

Imaging NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Electric field based dosing for TMS

Ole NumsseniD, Philipp KuhnkeiD, Konstantin WeiseiD, Gesa HartwigseniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

AbstractTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an invaluable non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique to modulate cortical activity and behavior, but high within- and between-participant variability limits its efficacy and reliability. Here, we explore the potential of electric field (e-field) based TMS dosing to reduce its variability and discuss current challenges as well as future pathways. In contrast to previous dosing approaches, e-field dosing better matches the stimulation strength across cortical areas, both within and across individuals. Challenges include methodological uncertainties of the e-field simulation, target definitions, and comparability of different stimulation thresholds across cortical areas and NIBS protocols. Despite these challenges, e-field dosing promises to substantially improve NIBS applications in neuroscientific research and personalized medicine. Outstanding Questions Box O_TEXTBOXOutstanding Questions O_LIDoes the cortical threshold for effective stimulation differ between primary regions and higher-level association areas? How large is the impact of cytoarchitectonic differences between regions on a stimulation threshold? C_LIO_LIDo cortical stimulation thresholds differ across individuals? Are thresholds stable within an individual across the lifespan? What are the physiological factors influencing these thresholds? C_LIO_LICan a cortical stimulation threshold measured with single-pulse TMS be transferred to repetitive TMS protocols for the study of cognition? C_LIO_LIHow does the cortical stimulation threshold interact with the current brain state? C_LI C_TEXTBOX Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=102 SRC="FIGDIR/small/551253v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16d6e44org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1626d90org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10713e7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1abdcaa_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Citations
52
FWCI
8.12
Field percentile
top 2%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHoornweder '23Thielscher '26Gomez '18Evans '19Johnstone '21Kasten '19
75% semantic matchNeuroscience
Sybren Van Hoornweder, Marten Nuyts, Joana Frieske+3 more·NeuroImage·Sep 15, 2023· 37 citations