Imaging NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Electric field based dosing for TMS
Ole NumsseniD, Philipp KuhnkeiD, Konstantin WeiseiD, Gesa HartwigseniD
Abstract
AbstractTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an invaluable non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique to modulate cortical activity and behavior, but high within- and between-participant variability limits its efficacy and reliability. Here, we explore the potential of electric field (e-field) based TMS dosing to reduce its variability and discuss current challenges as well as future pathways. In contrast to previous dosing approaches, e-field dosing better matches the stimulation strength across cortical areas, both within and across individuals. Challenges include methodological uncertainties of the e-field simulation, target definitions, and comparability of different stimulation thresholds across cortical areas and NIBS protocols. Despite these challenges, e-field dosing promises to substantially improve NIBS applications in neuroscientific research and personalized medicine. Outstanding Questions Box O_TEXTBOXOutstanding Questions O_LIDoes the cortical threshold for effective stimulation differ between primary regions and higher-level association areas? How large is the impact of cytoarchitectonic differences between regions on a stimulation threshold? C_LIO_LIDo cortical stimulation thresholds differ across individuals? Are thresholds stable within an individual across the lifespan? What are the physiological factors influencing these thresholds? C_LIO_LICan a cortical stimulation threshold measured with single-pulse TMS be transferred to repetitive TMS protocols for the study of cognition? C_LIO_LIHow does the cortical stimulation threshold interact with the current brain state? C_LI C_TEXTBOX Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=102 SRC="FIGDIR/small/551253v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16d6e44org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1626d90org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10713e7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1abdcaa_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
- Citations
- 52
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Systematic Review and Large-Scale tES and TMS Electric Field Modeling Study Reveals How Outcome Measure Selection Alters Results in a Person- and Montage-Specific Manner
Sybren Van Hoornweder, Marten Nuyts, … Kevin A. Caulfield·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2023
- Harmonizing the stimulation dose of focal tDCS across target sites
Axel Thielscher, Dayana Hayek, … Daria Antonenko·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2026
- Conditions for numerically accurate TMS electric field simulation
L. Gomez, M. Dannhauer, … A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2018
- Dose-controlled tDCS reduces electric field intensity variability at a cortical target site
Carys Evans, Clarissa Bachmann, … Sven Bestmann·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2019
- The impact of brain lesions on tDCS-induced electric field magnitude
Ainslie Johnstone, Catharina Zich, … Sven Bestmann·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021
- Integrating electric field modelling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects
Florian H. Kasten, Katharina Duecker, … Christoph Siegfried Herrmann·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2019