Brain stimulationNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Dose-controlled tDCS reduces electric field intensity variability at a cortical target site
Carys EvansiD, Clarissa Bachmann, Jenny S. A. Lee, Evridiki Gregoriou, Nick WardiD, Sven BestmanniD
Abstract
BackgroundVariable effects limit the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a research and therapeutic tool. Conventional application of a fixed-dose of tDCS does not account for inter-individual differences in anatomy (e.g. skull thickness), which varies the amount of current reaching the brain. Individualised dose-control may reduce the variable effects of tDCS by reducing variability in electric field intensities at a cortical target site.\n\nObjectiveTo characterise the variability in electric field intensity at a cortical site (left primary motor cortex; M1) and throughout the brain for conventional fixed-dose tDCS, and individualised dose-controlled tDCS.\n\nMethodsThe intensity and distribution of the electric field during tDCS was estimated using Realistic Volumetric Approach to Simulate Transcranial Electric Stimulation (ROAST) in 50 individual brain scans taken from the Human Connectome Project, for fixed-dose tDCS (1mA & 2mA) and individualised dose-controlled tDCS targeting left M1.\n\nResultsWith a fixed-dose (1mA & 2mA), E-field intensity in left M1 varied by more than 100% across individuals, with substantial variation observed throughout the brain as well. Individualised dose-controlled ensured the same E-field intensity was delivered to left M1 in all individuals. Its variance in other regions of interest (right M1 and area underneath the electrodes) was comparable with fixed- and individualised-dose.\n\nConclusionsIndividualized dose-control can eliminate the variance in electric field intensities at a cortical target site. Assuming that the current delivered to the brain directly determines its physiological and behavioural consequences, this approach may allow for reducing the known variability of tDCS effects.
- Citations
- 166
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Electric field dependent effects of motor cortical TDCS
Ilkka Laakso, Marko Mikkonen, … Satoshi Tanaka·bioRxiv·May 21, 2018
- The impact of brain lesions on tDCS-induced electric field magnitude
Ainslie Johnstone, Catharina Zich, … Sven Bestmann·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021
- Towards the identification and optimization of the "dose-response" relationship of transcranial direct current stimulation
Ricardo Salvador, Maria Chiara Biagi, … Giulio Ruffini·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2022
- Harmonizing the stimulation dose of focal tDCS across target sites
Axel Thielscher, Dayana Hayek, … Daria Antonenko·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2026
- The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal and cortico-cortical excitability and response variability: conventional versus high definition montages
Michael Pellegrini, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour J. Jaberzadeh·Neuroscience ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2020
- Integrating electric field modelling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects
Florian H. Kasten, Katharina Duecker, … Christoph Siegfried Herrmann·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2019