AJOB Empirical BioethicsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Development and validation of a stakeholder-driven, self-contained electronic informed consent platform for trio-based genomic research studies
Bethany Y. NortoniD, James Liu, Sara A. LewisiD, Helen Magee, Tyler N. Kruer, Rachael Dinh, Somayeh BakhtiariiD, Sandra H. Nordlie, Sheetal ShettyiD, Jennifer Heim, Yumi Nishiyama, Jorge I. Arango, Darcy Johnson, Lee Seabrooke, Mitchell D. ShubiD, Robert B. Rosenberg, Michele Shusterman, Stephen R. WisniewskiiD, Blair Cooper, Erin RothwelliD, Michael Collingwood FaheyiD, Michael Wade ShraderiD, Nancy LennoniD, Joyce L. OleszekiD, Wendy Pierce, , Michael C. KrueriD
Abstract
Increasingly long and complex informed consents have yielded studies demonstrating comparatively low participant comprehension and satisfaction with traditional face-to-face approaches. In parallel, interest in electronic consents for clinical and research genomics has steadily increased, yet limited data are available for trio-based genomic discovery studies. We describe the design, development, implementation, and validation of an electronic iConsent application for trio-based genomic research deployed to support genomic studies of cerebral palsy. iConsent development incorporated stakeholder perspectives including researchers, patient advocates, institutional review board members, and genomic data-sharing considerations. The iConsent platform integrated principles derived from prior electronic consenting research and elements of multimedia learning theory. Participant comprehension was assessed in an interactive teachback format. The iConsent application achieved nine of ten proposed desiderata for effective patient-focused electronic consenting for genomic research. Overall, participants demonstrated high comprehension and retention of key human subjects considerations. Enrollees reported high levels of satisfaction with the iConsent, and we found that participant comprehension, iConsent clarity, privacy protections, and study goal explanations were associated with overall satisfaction. Although opportunities exist to optimize iConsent, we show that such an approach is feasible, can satisfy multiple stakeholder requirements, and can realize high participant satisfaction and comprehension while increasing study reach.
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Field percentile
- top 16%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Development and Implementation of Novel Chatbot-based Genomic Research Consent
Erica D. Smith, Sarah K. Savage, … Eric J. N. Vilain·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2023
- A Study of Secondary School Students Participation in a Novel Course on Genomic Principles and Practices.
A. Stefanile·bioRxiv·May 22, 2020
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists
Miranda L. G. Hallquist, Maia J. Borensztein, … Kelly E. Ormond·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2023
- Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: A Delphi Study
Kelly E. Ormond, Maia J. Borensztein, … Curtis R. Coughlin·Journal of Personalized MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2021
- GUIA: a digital platform to facilitate result disclosure in genetic counseling
Sabrina A. Suckiel, Jaqueline A. Odgis, … Eimear E. Kenny·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 2, 2021
- Implementing a consultation service for translating genomic research findings into the clinic: lessons from the SickKids Genome Board
Amy Y. Pan, Kenzie Pulsifer, … Gregory Costain·Paediatrics & Child HealthPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025