bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
On-chip brain slice stimulation: precise control of electric fields and tissue orientation
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation modalities, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are widely used in neuroscience and clinical practice to modulate brain function and treat neuropsychiatric diseases. DC stimulation of ex vivo brain tissue slices has been a method used to understand mechanisms imparted by tDCS. However, delivering spatiotemporally uniform direct current electric fields (dcEFs) that have precisely engineered magnitudes and are also exempt from toxic electrochemical by-products are both significant limitations in conventional experimental setups. As a consequence, bioelectronic dose-response interrelations, the role of EF orientation, and the biomechanisms of prolonged or repeated stimulation over several days all remain not well understood. Here we developed a platform with fluidic, electrochemical, and magnetically-induced spatial control. Fluidically, the chamber geometrically confines precise dcEF delivery to the enclosed brain slice and allows for tissue recovery in order to monitor post-stimulation effects. Electrochemically, conducting hydrogel electrodes mitigate stimulation-induced faradaic reactions typical of commonly-used metal electrodes. Magnetically, we applied ferromagnetic substrates beneath the tissue and used an external permanent magnet to enable in situ rotational control in relation to the dcEF. By combining the microfluidic chamber with live-cell calcium imaging and electrophysiological recordings, we showcased the potential to study the acute and lasting effects of dcEFs with the potential of providing multi-session stimulation. This on-chip bioelectronic platform presents a modernized yet simple solution to electrically stimulate explanted tissue by offering more environmental control to users, which unlocks new opportunities to conduct thorough brain stimulation mechanistic investigations. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/536696v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (85K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10bac4dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15d1dd3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5119c8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@73b554_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modulation of slow and fast oscillations by direct current stimulation in the cerebral cortex in vitro
Mattia D’Andola, Julia F. Weinert, … Maria Victoria Sanchez-Vives·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2026
- Safety of Subdural Direct Current Stimulation: A Histological Study in the Ovine Brain
Michael Brosch, Hiroyuki Oya, … Kirill V. Nourski·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2026
- Biophysical modeling of the electric field magnitude and distribution induced by electrical stimulation with intracerebral electrodes
Fabiola Alonso, Borja Mercadal, … Julien Modolo·Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2023
- The impact of brain lesions on tDCS-induced electric field magnitude
Ainslie Johnstone, Catharina Zich, … Sven Bestmann·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021
- Neural Mechanisms of tDCS: Insights from an In-Vivo Rodent Model with Realistic Electric Field Strengths
Liyi Chen, Alireza Majdi, … Myles Mc Laughlin·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2024
- Optimizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target cortical electric field: Evidence from 3000 Human Connectome Project models
Kevin A. Caulfield, Mark S. George·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2021