henhaobio
Sign in

BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Group-walk, a rigorous approach to group-wise false discovery rate analysis by target-decoy competition

Jack FreestoneiD, Temana Short, William Stafford NobleiD, Uri KeichiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Target-decoy competition (TDC) is a commonly used method for false discovery rate (FDR) control in the analysis of tandem mass spectrometry data. This type of competitionbased FDR control has recently gained significant popularity in other fields after Barber and Candes laid its theoretical foundation in a more general setting that included the feature selection problem. In both cases, the competition is based on a head-to-head comparison between an (observed) target score and a corresponding decoy (knockoff) score. However, the effectiveness of TDC depends on whether the data is homogeneous, which is often not the case: in many settings, the data consists of groups with different score profiles or different proportions of true nulls. In such cases, applying TDC while ignoring the group structure often yields imbalanced lists of discoveries, where some groups might include relatively many false discoveries and other groups include relatively very few. On the other hand, as we show, the alternative approach of applying TDC separately to each group does not rigorously control the FDR. We developed Group-walk, a procedure that controls the FDR in the target-decoy / knockoff setting while taking into account a given group structure. Group-walk is derived from the recently developed AdaPT -- a general framework for controlling the FDR with sideinformation. We show using simulated and real datasets that when the data naturally divides into groups with different characteristics Group-walk can deliver consistent power gains that in some cases are substantial. These groupings include the precursor charge state (4% more discovered peptides at 1% FDR threshold), the peptide length (3.6% increase) and the mass difference due to modifications (26% increase). Group-walk is available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/groupwalk/index.html

Citations
11
FWCI
0.90
Field percentile
top 34%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLin '24Keich '18Couté '20Lin '22Debrie '23Freestone '25
68% semantic matchBioinformatics
Andy Lin, Donavan See, William E. Fondrie+2 more·PROTEOMICS·Feb 21, 2024· 11 citations