BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Group-walk, a rigorous approach to group-wise false discovery rate analysis by target-decoy competition
Jack FreestoneiD, Temana Short, William Stafford NobleiD, Uri KeichiD
Abstract
Target-decoy competition (TDC) is a commonly used method for false discovery rate (FDR) control in the analysis of tandem mass spectrometry data. This type of competitionbased FDR control has recently gained significant popularity in other fields after Barber and Candes laid its theoretical foundation in a more general setting that included the feature selection problem. In both cases, the competition is based on a head-to-head comparison between an (observed) target score and a corresponding decoy (knockoff) score. However, the effectiveness of TDC depends on whether the data is homogeneous, which is often not the case: in many settings, the data consists of groups with different score profiles or different proportions of true nulls. In such cases, applying TDC while ignoring the group structure often yields imbalanced lists of discoveries, where some groups might include relatively many false discoveries and other groups include relatively very few. On the other hand, as we show, the alternative approach of applying TDC separately to each group does not rigorously control the FDR. We developed Group-walk, a procedure that controls the FDR in the target-decoy / knockoff setting while taking into account a given group structure. Group-walk is derived from the recently developed AdaPT -- a general framework for controlling the FDR with sideinformation. We show using simulated and real datasets that when the data naturally divides into groups with different characteristics Group-walk can deliver consistent power gains that in some cases are substantial. These groupings include the precursor charge state (4% more discovered peptides at 1% FDR threshold), the peptide length (3.6% increase) and the mass difference due to modifications (26% increase). Group-walk is available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/groupwalk/index.html
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Field percentile
- top 34%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Target-decoy false discovery rate estimation using Crema
Andy Lin, Donavan See, … William Stafford Noble·PROTEOMICSPeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2024
- An averaging strategy to reduce variability in target-decoy estimates of false discovery rate
Uri Keich, Kaipo Tamura, William Stafford Noble·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2018
- Beyond target-decoy competition: stable validation of peptide and protein identifications in mass spectrometry-based discovery proteomics
Yohann Couté, Christophe Bruley, Thomas Bürger·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2020
- Improving peptide-level mass spectrometry analysis via double competition
Andy Lin, Temana Short, … Uri Keich·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2022
- Quality control for the target decoy approach for peptide identification
Elke Debrie, Milan Malfait, … Lieven Clement·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2023
- How to train a post-processor for tandem mass spectrometry proteomics database search while maintaining control of the false discovery rate
Jack Freestone, Lukas Käll, … Uri Keich·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2025