Behavioral EcologyAnimal Behavior & CognitionPeer-reviewed journal article
Social and ecological factors associated with innovation in urban sulphur-crested cockatoos (Cacatua galerita)
Lisa FontanaiD, Sofia BolcatoiD, Julia PenndorfiD, Lucy M. ApliniD
Abstract
Why some species thrive in urban environments while others do not is a central question in behavioral ecology. Behavioral innovations has been proposed as a key mechanism facilitating this adaptation. At the individual level, innovativeness varies with cognitive and behavioral traits. However, at the population level, innovation rates can also be influenced by social and ecological factors including group size, and environmental novelty and complexity. The role of these factors are still under-explored, especially at within-city scales. To disentangle factors influencing group-level variation in innovation rates, we presented roosts of wild sulphur-crested cockatoos Cacatua galerita, with extractive-foraging tasks that required innovative problem-solving. We installed three tasks of different levels of difficulty on trees at fifteen communal roost sites across an urban matrix. We matched these with direct measures of roost-size and connectivity, and with high-resolution remote-sensing mapping to estimate variation in urbanization and environmental heterogeneity. We found that approach time was significantly associated with urbanization, with individuals in more urban sites approaching tasks more quickly, suggesting reduced neophobia with urbanization or increased familiarity with human-derived objects. In contrast, time to innovate in our study was explained by task difficulty rather than environmental and social factors. While we detected no significant effects of group size, connectivity, and environmental heterogeneity, larger sample sizes may be needed to reveal more subtle influences on innovation. Together, these results suggest that urbanization gradients can shape behavioral responses to novelty independently from problem-solving abilities. Lay SummaryCities are challenging places for wildlife, but some species, like sulphur-crested cockatoos, adapt by finding new ways to feed and solve problems. We studied how urbanization and social factors vary with cockatoos ability to innovate when presented with extractive-foraging tasks. We found that birds in more urban areas approached the tasks more quickly, suggesting reduced neophobia or increased familiarity with novel objects. This work highlights behavioral differences across urbanization gradients in human-dominated environments.
- organism: non-human primate
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Wild sulphur-crested cockatoos match human activity rhythms to access food in the urban environment
G. Fehlmann, J. M. Martin, … L. M. Aplin·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2023
- The Effect of Human Presence and Activity Type on Innovative Problem-Solving of Urban Eurasian Red Squirrels.
Pizza Ka Yee Chow, Olli Loukola, Cwyn Solvi·Behavioral EcologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025
- Individual variation in tolerance of human activity by urban dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis).
H. M. Stansell, D. T. Blumstein, … P. Nonacs·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2020
- Time in the city: Long-term urban exposure predicts greater exploration and problem-solving in wild red foxes
Frederick Blake Morton, Dylan Thompson‐Jones, … Carl D. Soulsbury·Animal BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2026
- Temporal dynamics and policy implications in an innovation arms race
Michael Chimento, Edwin S. Dalmaijer, … Lucy M. Aplin·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2025
- Individual repeatability, species differences, and the influence of socio-ecological factors on neophobia in 10 corvid species
R. Miller, M. L. Lambert, … N. S. Clayton·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2021