bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes
Abstract
Directed microbial evolution harnesses evolutionary processes in the laboratory to construct microorganisms with enhanced or novel functional traits. Attempting to direct evolutionary processes for applied goals is fundamental to evolutionary computation, which harnesses the principles of Darwinian evolution as a general purpose search engine for solutions to challenging computational problems. Despite their overlapping approaches, artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing are not commonly applied to living systems in the laboratory. In this work, we ask if parent selection algorithms--procedures for choosing promising progenitors--from evolutionary computation might be useful for directing the evolution of microbial populations when selecting for multiple functional traits. To do so, we introduce an agent-based model of directed microbial evolution, which we used to evaluate how well three selection algorithms from evolutionary computing (tournament selection, lexicase selection, and non-dominated elite selection) performed relative to methods commonly used in the laboratory (elite and top-10% selection). We found that multi-objective selection techniques from evolutionary computing (lexicase and non-dominated elite) generally outperformed the commonly used directed evolution approaches when selecting for multiple traits of interest. Our results motivate ongoing work transferring these multi-objective selection procedures into the laboratory. Additionally, our findings suggest that more sophisticated artificial selection methods from evolutionary computation should also be evaluated for use in directed microbial evolution.
- research focus: synaptic & neural circuits
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: development & morphogenesis
- research focus: cancer & tumor microenvironment
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Top-down engineering of complex communities by directed evolution
C.-Y. Chang, J. C. C. Vila, … A. Sanchez·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2020
- Steering ecological-evolutionary dynamics during artificial selection of microbial communities
- Novel artificial selection method improves function of simulated microbial communities
B. Vessman, P. Guridi-Fernandez, … S. Mitri·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2023
- Optimised control of adaptive evolution with competing selective pressures
Marco Corrao, Gabriel Abrahams, Harrison Steel·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2024
- Artificial selection improves pollutant degradation by bacterial communities
F. I. Arias-Sanchez, B. Vessman, … S. Mitri·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2023
- The microbiome wants what it wants: microbial evolution overtakes experimental host-mediated indirect selection
J. Arora, M. Mars Brisbin, A. Mikheyev·bioRxiv·Jul 19, 2019