Single-dimensional human brain signals for two-dimensional economic choice options
Leo Chi U SeakiD, Konstantin VolkmanniD, Alexandre Pastor‐BernieriD, Fabian Grabenhorst BiD, Wolfram SchultziD
Abstract
Rewarding choice options typically contain multiple components, but neural signals in single brain voxels are scalar and primarily vary up or down. In a previous study, we had designed reward bundles that contained the same two milkshakes with independently set amounts; we had used psychophysics and rigorous economic concepts to estimate two-dimensional choice indifference curves (IC) that represented revealed stochastic preferences for these bundles in a systematic, integrated manner. All bundles on the same ICs were equally revealed preferred (and thus had same utility, as inferred from choice indifference); bundles on higher ICs (higher utility) were preferred to bundles on lower ICs (lower utility). In the current study, we used the established behavior for testing with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We now demonstrate neural responses in reward-related brain structures of human female and male participants, including striatum, midbrain and medial orbitofrontal cortex that followed the characteristic pattern of ICs: similar responses along ICs (same utility despite different bundle composition), but monotonic change across ICs (different utility). Thus, these brain structures integrated multiple reward components into a scalar signal, well beyond the known subjective value coding of single-component rewards. Significance StatementRewards have several components, like the taste and size of an apple, but it is unclear how each component contributes to the overall value of the reward. While choice indifference curves of economic theory provide behavioural approaches to this question, it is unclear whether brain responses capture the preference and utility integrated from multiple components. We report activations in striatum, midbrain and orbitofrontal cortex that follow choice indifference curves representing behavioral preferences over and above variations of individual reward components. In addition, the concept-driven approach encourages future studies on natural, multi-component rewards that are prone to irrational choice of normal and brain-damaged individuals.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Field percentile
- top 23%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Experimentally revealed stochastic preferences for multi-component choice options
Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Konstantin Volkmann, … Wolfram Schultz·bioRxiv·May 23, 2020
- Mechanisms Underlying Economic Revealed Preference Of Multi-Component Bundles In Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Wolfram Schultz·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2021
- Reward-specific satiety affects subjective value signals in orbitofrontal cortex during multi-component economic choice
Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Arkadiusz Stasiak, Wolfram Schultz·bioRxiv·Jul 4, 2020
- Choosing the best or avoiding the worst: complementary and opponent value signals in the human brain
Clarissa Baratin, Alizée Lopez‐Persem, … Julien Bastin·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2025
- Values Encoded in Orbitofrontal Cortex Are Causally Related to Economic Choices
Sébastien Ballesta, Weikang Shi, … Camillo Padoa‐Schioppa·NaturePeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2020
- Neuronal Activity in Orbitofrontal Cortex during Trinary Choices under Risk
Miguel Barretto García, Jiaxin Cindy Tu, Camillo Padoa‐Schioppa·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 30, 2026