bioRxivMicrobiology
Assessing the activity of different plant-derived molecules and potential biological nitrification inhibitors on a range of soil ammonia- and nitrite- oxidizing strains
M. Kolovou, D. Panagiotou, L. Sube, O. Loiseleur, S. Williams, D. G. Karpouzas, E. S. Papadopoulou
Abstract
Nitrification is associated with significant losses of fertilizer-derived ammonium from agroecosystems. The use of biological nitrification inhibitors (BNIs), in place of synthetic nitrification inhibitors (SNIs), holds a great potential to effectively reduce N losses and conforms with the current move towards ecological-intensified agriculture. Knowledge of the activity of BNIs to soil nitrifiers is limited and is mostly based on bioassays with a single Nitrosomonas europaea strain. We determined the in vitro activity of multiple plant-derived compounds as BNIs like (i) root-derived compounds (sakuranetin, MHPP, and zeanone); (ii) other phytochemicals (caffeic acid, quinic acid, chlorogenic acid and shikimic acid), and (iii) analogues of statins (simvastatin), triazoles (1-butyl-4-propyl-triazole, 1,4-dibutyltriazole) and zeanone (2-methoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone), on ecophysiologically and phylogenetically distinct soil-derived ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) (Nitrosospira multiformis and N. europaea), ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) (Candidatus Nitrosotalea sinensis and Candidatus Nitrosocosmicus franklandianus), and a nitrite-oxidizing bacterium (NOB) (Nitrobacter sp. NHB1). AOA were more sensitive than AOB to BNIs. Sensitivity within AOA group was BNI-dependent, unlike AOB for which N. multiformis was consistently more sensitive than N. europaea. Interestingly, several compounds were inhibitory to Nitrobacter sp. with MHPP and caffeic acid being more potent to the NOB compared to the AOB and AOA strains, an observation with potentially serious implications for soil quality and agricultural production. Overall, zeanone, MHPP and caffeic acid were the most potent BNIs towards AOB, zeanone and 2-methoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone were the most effective compounds against AOA, while caffeic acid was the most potent BNI on Nitrobacter sp. We provide pioneering evidence for the activity range of multiple BNIs on soil nitrifiers, stress the need for revisiting the biological screening systems currently used for BNI determination and we sought for a more thorough monitoring of the impact of BNI candidates on a range of both target and non-target microorganisms.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Beyond efficacy: Persistence and off-target effects of three biological nitrification inhibitors in two contrasting agricultural soils
Paula Andrea Rojas-Pinzón, Bernhard Seidl, … Petra Pjevac·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2026
- Comparison of the in vitro activity of novel and established nitrification inhibitorsapplied in agriculture: challenging the effectiveness of the currently availablecompounds
E. S. Papadopoulou, E. Bachtsevani, … D. G. Karpouzas·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2020
- A fast-track, high-throughput screening platform for biological nitrification inhibitors discovery based on soil relevant ammonia oxidizing strains
Alexandros E. Kanellopoulos, Andrea Malits, … Evangelia S. Papadopoulou·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2024
- New high-throughput screening assays for nitrification inhibitors identify an oxazolidine-thione as biological nitrification inhibitor
F. Beeckman, A. Drozdzecki, … H. Motte·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2024
- Potential of exogenous biological nitrification inhibitor addition to improve soil nitrogen availability for crop growth.
Paula Andrea Rojas-Pinzón, Bernhard Seidl, … Lucia Fuchslueger·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2026
- Benefits and limits of biological nitrification inhibitors for plant N uptake and the environment
C. W. Kuppe, J. A. Postma·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2023