bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
Evaluation of Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms with Intermittent Electrochemically-Generated H2O2 or HOCl
M. M. I. Anoy, W.-J. Kim, S. Gelston, D. Fleming, R. Patel, H. Beyenal
Abstract
Chronic wound infections can be difficult to treat and may lead to impaired healing and worsened patient outcomes. Novel treatment strategies are needed. This study evaluated effects of intermittently produced H2O2 and HOCl, generated via an electrochemical bandage (e-bandage), against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in an agar membrane biofilm model. By changing the working electrode potential, the e-bandage generated either HOCl (1.5 VAg/AgCl) or H2O2 (-0.6 VAg/AgCl). The degree of biocidal activity of intermittent treatment with HOCl and H2O2 correlated with HOCl treatment time; HOCl treatment durations of 0, 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 hours (with the rest of the 6 hour total treatment time devoted to H2O2 generation) resulted in mean biofilm reductions of 1.36{+/-}0.2, 2.22{+/-}0.16, 3.46{+/-}0.38, 4.63{+/-}0.74 and 7.66{+/-}0.5 log CFU/cm2, respectively vs. non-polarized controls, respectively. However, application of H2O2 immediately after HOCl treatment was detrimental to biofilm removal. For example, 3-hours HOCl treatment followed by 3-hours H2O2 resulted in a 1.90{+/-}0.84 log CFU/cm2 lower mean biofilm reduction than 3-hours HOCl treatment followed by 3-hours non-polarization. HOCl generated over 3-hours exhibited biocidal activity for at least 7.5-hours after e-bandage operation ceased; 3-hours of HOCl generation followed by 7.5-hours of non-polarization resulted in a biofilm cell reduction of 7.92{+/-}0.12 log CFU/cm2 vs. non polarized controls. Finally, intermittent treatment with HOCl (i.e., interspersed with periods of e-bandage non-polarization) for various intervals showed similar effects (approximately 6 log CFU/cm2 reduction vs. non-polarized control) to continuous treatment with HOCl for 3-hours, followed by 3-hours of non-polarization. These findings suggest that timing and sequencing of HOCl and H2O2 treatments are crucial for maximizing biofilm control.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- HOCl-producing Electrochemical Bandages for Treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Murine Wounds
D. Fleming, I. Bozyel, … R. Patel·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2023
- HOCl-producing Electrochemical Bandage is Active in Murine Polymicrobial Wound Infection
D. Fleming, I. Bozyel, … R. Patel·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2024
- DUAL ACTION ELECTROCHEMICAL BANDAGE OPERATED by a PROGRAMMABLE MULTIMODAL WEARABLE POTENTIOSTAT
I. Bozyel, D. Fleming, … H. Beyenal·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2024
- A Drug Combination Approach Targeting Both Growing Bacteria and Dormant Persisters Eradicate Persistent Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Infection
- A Structurally Defined C12-Alkyl Quaternary Ammonium Compound reduces bacterial burden and biofilm in an infected wound model
Madelyn Kist, I Gusti Ayu I Wulandari, … Chad J. Roy·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2026
- Synergistic Activity of Silver Nanoparticles and Vancomycin Against a Spectrum of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Types
Bryan B. Hair, Matthew E. Conley, … Bradford K. Berges·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2018