scientometrics and bibliometrics research

This study analyzes neurology research output and citations across 47 Asian countries from 2013 to 2022, revealing high activity but significant disparities in research output and impact.

This study uses bibliometric analysis to examine cafeteria diet research, identifying trends and key contributors in the field of neurobiological and behavioral disturbances.

The paper analyzes global research output and growth rates from 2020-2023, finding Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan had the highest growth rates, with Saudi Arabia leading in international collaboration and citations per paper.

This study uses bibliometric analysis to map global chordoma research trends from 1991 to 2021, identifying key countries, institutions, journals, and research clusters.

The paper estimates the size of biomedical research fields by counting unique authors in PubMed publications, finding significant variation in subfield sizes and potential correlations with workforce strength and public health burden.

This paper compares molecular autism research publications from Africa, focusing on South Africa, with Brazil, India, the UK, and the USA, highlighting disparities in publication output and potential barriers.

In five top neuroscience journals, papers with name-inferred first and last authors of color are under-cited, mostly by White-led teams, and the gap is growing.

This paper constructs and analyzes a keyword network from biomedical publications to study the evolution of scientific research and identify patterns in discovery.

The paper analyzes disparities in recognition of computational biology researchers based on gender, name origin, country, and race/ethnicity.

The paper estimates the scale of biomedical data generation by analyzing text mining of research articles' methods sections using word embeddings.