This paper evaluates structured peer review by analyzing reviewer responses, agreement, and improvements in recommendation consistency across 23 Elsevier journals.

bioRxiv · Feb 1, 2024Scientific Communication & Education

Mapping the content of comments on bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints

C. F. D. Carneiro, G. Costa, K. Neves, M. B. Abreu, P. B. Tan, D. Rayee, F. Boos, R. Andrejew, T. Lubiana, M. Malicki, O. B. Amaral

The paper analyzes comments on bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints to assess their content and compare it to traditional peer review.

bioRxiv · Nov 23, 2022Scientific Communication & Education

Attitudes and Practices of Open Data, Preprinting, and Peer-review - a Cross Sectional Study on Croatian Scientists

K. Bazdaric, I. Vrkic, E. Arh, M. Mavrinac, M. Gligora Markovic, L. Bilic-Zulle, J. Stojanovski, M. Malicki

This study develops and validates a questionnaire to measure attitudes towards open data, preprints, and peer-review among Croatian scientists, finding generally neutral attitudes with the lowest support for open peer-review in small communities.

bioRxiv · Nov 25, 2020Scientific Communication & Education

From amazing work to I beg to differ - analysis of bioRxiv preprints that received one public comment till September 2019

M. Malicki, J. Costello, J. P. Alperin, L. A. Maggio

The paper analyzes bioRxiv preprint comments to assess their nature and contributors, finding most comments come from non-authors and include reviews, praises, and suggestions.

bioRxiv · Oct 14, 2020Scientific Communication & Education