Sign in
NeuroscienceTranslational Vision Science & Technology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Interocular Symmetry and Repeatability of Foveal Outer Nuclear Layer Thickness in Congenital Achromatopsia

Rebecca Mastey, Mina GaffneyiD, Katie M. LittsiD, Christopher S. LangloiD, Emily J PattersoniD, Margaret R. Strampe, Angelos A. KalitzeosiD, Michel MichaelidesiD, Joseph CarrolliD

Abstract

PurposeTo examine the intraobserver repeatability of foveal outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness measurements and evaluate interocular symmetry for patients with achromatopsia (ACHM) and controls.\n\nDesignCross-sectional study.\n\nSubjectsSixty-four patients with CNGA3- or CNGB3-associated ACHM and 38 patients with normal vision were recruited for analysis.\n\nMethodsHorizontal line scans through the fovea of each eye were acquired using optical coherence tomography. Three foveal ONL thickness measurements were made by a single observer using custom software to analyze repeatability. Interocular symmetry was assessed using the average of the three measurements for each eye.\n\nMain Outcome MeasuresThe main parameter being measured is foveal ONL thickness.\n\nResultsMean ({+/-} SD) foveal ONL thickness for ACHM patients was 74.86 {+/-} 17.82m (OD) and 75.30 {+/-} 15.68m (OS) compared to 110.60 {+/-} 15.67m (OD) and 110.53 {+/-} 13.91m (OS) for controls. Foveal ONL thickness did not differ between eyes for ACHM (p = 0.821) or control patients (p = 0.961). Intraobserver repeatability was high for foveal ONL measurements in ACHM patients (ICC = 0.939, OD and 0.915, OS) and controls (ICC = 0.991, OD and 0.984, OS).\n\nConclusionsFoveal ONL thickness can be measured with excellent repeatability. While foveal ONL thickness is reduced in ACHM compared to controls, the high interocular symmetry indicates that contralateral ONL measurements could be used as a negative control in early-phase monocular treatment trials.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
24
FWCI
1.65
Field percentile
top 16%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISGhassabi '21Wang '19Bagheri '19Moon '22Schmittwilk '25Tuten '18
58% semantic matchBioengineering
Z. Ghassabi, R. Kuranov, M. Wu+8 more·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2021