Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits.
Wei‐Yeh LiaoiD, Ryoki SasakiiD, John G. SemmleriD, George M. OpieiD
Abstract
While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late I-wave circuits. 22 young adults (22 {+/-} 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCSCB). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS1.5), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS4.5), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMSSham). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP1mV) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEPPA) and anterior-posterior (MEPAP) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP1mV, CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCSCB broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEPAP also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEPPA potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions suggests that the disruptive effects of CB modulation on M1 plasticity may be selectively mediated by AP-sensitive circuits (also likely recruited with MEP1mV, CBI, and SICF).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Field percentile
- top 32%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modulation of I-wave generating pathways with repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: A TMS-EEG study
Ryoki Sasaki, Brodie J. Hand, … George M. Opie·bioRxiv·May 23, 2022
- Beneficial effects of cerebellar tDCS on motor learning are associated with altered putamen-cerebellar connectivity: a simultaneous tDCS-fMRI study
Matthias Liebrand, Anke Ninija Karabanov, … Elinor Tzvi·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2020
- Modulation of motor cortex plasticity by repetitive paired-pulse TMS at late I-wave intervals is influenced by intracortical excitability
George M. Opie, Ryoki Sasaki, … John G. Semmler·Brain SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2021
- Utilising TMS-EEG to assess the response to cerebellar-brain inhibition
Ryoki Sasaki, Brodie J. Hand, … George M. Opie·The CerebellumPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2022
- Polarity-dependent modulation of sensory circuits by cerebellar tDCS: local and distant effects
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-León, Isabel Cordones, … Javier Márquez‐Ruiz·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2026
- Investigation of neuromodulatory effect of anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the primary motor cortex using functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Zeshan Shoaib, Won Kee Chang, … Won‐Seok Kim·The CerebellumPeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2023