A closed-loop language-model agent for target-specific multi-objective hit-to-lead optimization

Abstract

Hit-to-lead optimization is a multi-objective molecular-design problem in which binding-related scores must be considered together with drug-likeness and synthetic accessibility. We developed a closed-loop language-model medicinal-chemistry agent that combines target and starting-hit context, PubMed retrieval, molecular-property tools, docking, and feedback from previously scored analogues. In a matched computational benchmark comprising six kinase targets, six methods, a 40-candidate budget, and six independent campaigns per method, the agent achieved the highest mean aggregate score under a pre-specified composite objective on four targets. Re-analysis of the same candidate sets with drug-likeness-gated docking and docking-drug-likeness hypervolume produced different target-level winners, showing that evaluation rules can change the comparative interpretation of an optimization campaign. Candidate distributions and component ablations indicated that the agent's advantage was associated primarily with retention of scored-candidate feedback and higher-QED regions rather than with docking alone. An EGFR case study illustrates a scaffold-preserving in-silico optimization trajectory from erlotinib. The study is a computational benchmark and evaluation framework; the prioritized molecules are hypotheses for subsequent experimental testing, not experimentally validated leads.