Sign in
GenomicsJournal of Molecular Diagnostics
Peer-reviewed journal article

Third Generation Cytogenetic Analysis (TGCA): diagnostic application of long-read sequencing.

Pamela MaginiiD, Alessandra MingrinoiD, Barbara GegaiD, Gianluca MatteiiD, Roberto SemeraroiD, Davide BologniniiD, Patrizia Mongelli, Laura DesiderioiD, Maria Carla PittalisiD, Tommaso PippucciiD, Alberto MagiiD

Abstract

Unbalanced Structural Variants (uSVs) play important roles in the pathogenesis of several genetic syndromes. Traditional and molecular karyotyping are considered the first-tier diagnostic tests to detect macroscopic and cryptic deletions/duplications. However, their time-consuming and laborious experimental protocols protract diagnostic times from three to fifteen days. Long read sequencing approaches, such as Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), have the ability to reduce time to results for the detection of uSVs with the same resolution of current state-of-the-art diagnostic tests. Here we compared ONT to molecular karyotyping for the detection of pathogenic uSVs of 7 patients with previously diagnosed causative CNVs of different sizes and allelic fractions. Larger chromosomal anomalies included trisomy 21 and mosaic tetrasomy 12p. Among smaller CNVs we tested two reciprocal genomic imbalances in 7q11.23 (1.367 Mb), a 170 kb deletion encompassing NRXN1 and mosaic 6q27 (1.231 Mb) and 2q23.1 (408 kb) deletions. DNA libraries were prepared following ONT standard protocols and sequenced on the GridION device for 48 h. Data generated during runs were analysed in online mode, using NanoGLADIATOR. We were capable to identify all pathogenic CNVs with detection time inversely proportional to size and allelic fraction. Aneuploidies were called after only 30 minutes of sequencing, while 30 hours were needed to call CNVs < 500 kb also in mosaic state (44%). These results demonstrate the clinical utility of our approach that allows the molecular diagnosis of genomic disorders within a 30 minutes to 30 hours time-frame.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHu '20Leung '22Cretu-Stanc '17Garcia '17Keşküş '25Jiang '20
61% semantic matchGenetics
Liang Hu, Fan Liang, Dehua Cheng+10 more·Frontiers in Genetics·Jan 14, 2020· 60 citations