Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults
Jonathan T. W. SchubertiD, Stephanie BaddeiD, Brigitte RöderiD, Tobias HeediD
Abstract
Task demands modulate tactile localization in sighted humans, presumably through weight adjustments in the spatial integration of anatomical, skin-based, and external, posture-based information. In contrast, previous studies have suggested that congenitally blind humans, by default, refrain from automatic spatial integration and localize touch using only skin-based information. Here, sighted and congenitally blind participants localized tactile targets on the palm or back of one hand, while ignoring simultaneous tactile distractors at congruent or incongruent locations on the other hand. We probed the interplay of anatomical and external location codes for spatial congruency effects by varying hand posture: the palms either both faced down, or one faced down and one up. In the latter posture, externally congruent target and distractor locations were anatomically incongruent and vice versa. Target locations had to be reported either anatomically (\"palm\" or \"back\" of the hand), or externally (\"up\" or \"down\" in space). Under anatomical instructions, performance was better for anatomically congruent than incongruent target-distractor pairs. In contrast, under external instructions, performance was better for externally congruent than incongruent pairs. These modulations were evident in sighted and blind individuals. Notably, distractor effects were overall far smaller in blind than in sighted participants, despite comparable target-distractor identification performance. Thus, the absence of developmental vision seems to be associated with an increased ability to focus tactile attention towards a non-spatially defined target. Nevertheless, that blind individuals exhibited effects of hand posture and task instructions in their congruency effects suggests that, like the sighted,, they automatically integrate anatomical and external information during tactile localization. Moreover, spatial integration in tactile processing is, thus, flexibly adapted by top-down information - here, task instruction - even in the absence of developmental vision.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Field percentile
- top 26%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Visual experience shapes the neural networks remapping touch into external space
Virginie Crollen, Latifa Lazzouni, … Olivier Collignon·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2017
- Cross-modal interactions and movement-related tactile gating: the role of vision
María Casado-Palacios, Alessia Tonelli, … Monica Gori·Brain SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2025
- Alpha-band oscillations reflect external spatial coding for tactile stimuli in sighted, but not in congenitally blind humans
Jonathan T. W. Schubert, Verena Nadine Buchholz, … Tobias Heed·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2019
- External location of touch is constructed post-hoc based on limb choice
Femke Maij, Christian Seegelke, … Tobias Heed·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2020
- Flexible Perception of Tactile Cues in Multiple Reference Frames
Himanshu Ahuja, Sabyasachi Shivkumar, … Manuel Gomez‐Ramirez·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2023
- Principles of tactile search over the body
Elizabeth J. Halfen, John F. Magnotti, … Jeffrey M. Yau·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2020