medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Multi-Cancer PRS Constellation Model for Cancer Risk Prediction
Núria MoragasiD, Anna Díez-VillanuevaiD, Ferrán Moratalla-NavarroiD, Pablo Fernández‐NavarroiD, Beatriz Pérez‐GómeziD, María Morales‐Suárez‐VarelaiD, Ana Molina‐BarcelóiD, Gemma Castaño‐VinyalsiD, Blanca Rius‐SansalvadoriD, Lois Riobó‐MayoiD, Rocío Olmedo‐RequenaiD, José Juan Jiménez‐MoleóniD, Rafael Marcos‐GrageraiD, Marcela GuevaraiD, Guillermo Fernández‐TardóniD, Pilar Amiano Exezarreta, José María HuertaiD, Tania Fernández-Villa, Antonio José Molina de la Torre, Vicente MartíniD, Inés Gómez‐AceboiD, Trinidad Dierssen‐SotosiD, Juan AlguaciliD, Elisabet GuinóiD, Manolis KogevinasiD, , Victor Rau MorenoiD
Abstract
Cancer development is influenced by genetic factors and modifiable exposures. GWAS has identified genetic variants and developed of prediction models through Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS), but PRS alone has limitations for estimating cancer risk. This study assesses a novel PRS constellation approach that integrates Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) from both lifestyle and genetic traits to enhance prediction models for colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers. The approach was developed using the UK Biobank dataset and validated in the independent GenRisk cohort. The model, incorporating sex and age, achieved AUCs of 0.74 for CRC, 0.65 for BC, and 0.75 for PC in the UK Biobank. Including tumor-related PRSs improved PC prediction but had limited impact on CRC and BC. Age and sex inclusion boosted CRC and PC model accuracy. However, GenRisk validation showed reduced AUCs and limited utility of lifestyle PRSs, with CRC and BC models achieving 0.62 and PC 0.56. Integrating lifestyle-related characteristics into PRS does not significantly enhance cancer-specific PRS prediction. However, PRSs for these traits show independent predictive power, highlighting the importance of considering lifestyle in cancer risk and the need for precision medicine to improve early detection.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: polygenic risk
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction
Linda Kachuri, Rebecca E. Graff, … Mattias Johansson·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2020
- Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study
Peh Joo Ho, Iain Beehuat Tan, … Jingmei Li·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2023
- Performance of polygenic risk scores for cancer prediction in a racially diverse academic biobank
Louise L. Wang, Heena Desai, … Kara N. Maxwell·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2021
- Precision Colorectal Cancer Screening with Polygenic Risk Score
Tõnis Tasa, Mikk Puustusmaa, … Peeter Padrik·medRxiv·Aug 19, 2020
- Cancer Diagnosis, Polygenic Risk, and Longevity-Associated Variants.
Laura H. Goetz, Janith Don, … Nicholas J. Schork·medRxiv·Sep 18, 2020
- Ability of a polygenic risk score to refine colorectal cancer risk in Lynch syndrome
Núria Dueñas, Hannah Klinkhammer, … Joan Brunet·Journal of Medical GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2023