Sign in
BioinformaticsbioRxiv
Preprint

Virtual-cell verification enables self-auditing AI discovery for immune rejuvenation

Yue YouiD, Xueying FaniD, 李光鹏, Wenchan Deng, Yunlin FuiD, Huimin HuiD, Wenle ReniD, Shihong LuiD, Guobin Han, Jian ShaoiD, Shuangjia ZhengiD, Kaixin ZhouiD, Jiaming Kong, Jinzheng Chen, Xiaodong Liu, Luyi TianiD

Abstract

Artificial-intelligence agents propose drug-discovery hypotheses faster than experiments can test them, yet their conclusions are rarely verified, against the underlying biology, the predicted perturbation, or the agent's own scoring logic. We close this verification gap with an agentic framework built on three verifiers. First, PACE, a phenotype verifier, resolves immune aging into ten directionally scored, cell-type-resolved gene-set modules, selected for cross-cohort stability across four PBMC cohorts, and outperforms five established aging clocks in an independent in-house aging cohort of 434 elderly donors. Second, CellQ, a virtual-cell verifier built with multi-modal LLM, compresses each single-cell transcriptome into eight discrete tokens aligned to a language model's vocabulary through residual vector quantization; it attains state-of-the-art perturbation prediction and uniquely resolves the weak, module-level shifts that differential-expression recovery misses. Third, an Analyzer-Planner-Auditor agent verifies its own scoring logic: screening 110 compounds in primary human PBMCs, it found aged-down modules more reversible than aged-up modules and revised its objective from an equal-weight mean to a balance-constrained minimum, a self-correction that generalized to an independent 13-compound T-cell assay. By verifying its predictions and its own objective against experiment, the framework points beyond hypothesis-generating AI toward self-correcting AI scientists whose objectives could continuously evolve.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.