Escaping from multiple visual threats: Modulation of escape responses in Pacific staghorn sculpin (Leptocottus armatus).
H. Kimura, T. Pfalzgraff, M. Levet, Y. Kawabata, J. F. Steffensen, J. L. Johansen, P. Domenici
Abstract
Fish perform rapid escape responses to avoid sudden predatory attacks. During escape responses, fish bend their bodies into a C-shape and quickly turn away from the predator and accelerate. The escape trajectory is determined by the initial turn (Stage 1) and a contralateral bend (Stage 2). Previous studies have used a single threat or model predator as a stimulus. In nature, however, multiple predators may attack from different directions simultaneously or in close succession. It is unknown whether fish are able to change the course of their escape response when startled by multiple stimuli at various time intervals. Pacific staghorn sculpin (Leptocottus armatus) were startled with a left and right visual stimulus in close succession. By varying the timing of the second stimulus, we were able to determine when and how a second stimulus could affect the escape response direction. Four treatments were used: a single visual stimulus (control); or two stimuli coming from opposite sides separated by a 0 ms (simultaneous treatment); a 33 ms; or a 83 ms time interval. The 33 ms and 83 ms time intervals were chosen to occur shortly before and after a predicted 60 ms visual escape latency (i.e. during Stage 1). The 0 ms and 33 ms treatments influenced both the escape trajectory and the Stage 1 turning angle, compared to a single stimulation, whereas the 83 ms treatment had no effect on the escape response. We conclude that Pacific staghorn sculpin can modulate their escape response only between stimulation and the onset of the response, but that escape responses are ballistic after the body motion has started. SUMMARY STATEMENTUsing double stimulation from opposite sides at different time intervals to simulate coordinated predatory attacks, Pacific staghorn sculpin escape away from the first stimulus, but were unable to turn away from the second stimulus while the escape response was in progress.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reef fish escape responses selectively match predator attack speeds
Sara Linde Neven, Lena Faber, Benjamin T. Martin·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2026
- Action selection based on multiple-stimulus aspects in the wind-elicited escape behavior of crickets
N. Sato, H. Shidara, H. Ogawa·HeliyonPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Kinematics and timing of escape responses in Spotted Ratfish (Hydrolagus colliei) and comparison with elasmobranchs and teleosts
Vincent Mélançon, Heather Bauer Reid, … Paolo Domenici·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2026
- Stimulus contrast information modulates sensorimotor decision making in goldfish
Santiago Otero-Coronel, Nicolás Martorell, … Violeta Medan·Frontiers in Neural CircuitsPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2020
- Effect Of Initial Body Orientation On Escape Probability In Prey Fish Escaping From Predators
H. Kimura, Y. Kawabata·bioRxiv·May 7, 2017
- Prepontine non-giant neurons drive flexible escape behavior in zebrafish
Gregory D. Marquart, Kathryn M. Tabor, … Harold A. Burgess·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2019