HeliyonAnimal Behavior & CognitionPeer-reviewed journal article
Action selection based on multiple-stimulus aspects in the wind-elicited escape behavior of crickets
Abstract
Animals detect approaching predators via sensory inputs through various modalities and immediately show an appropriate behavioral response to survive. Escape behavior is essential to avoid the predators attack and is more frequently observed than other defensive behaviors. In some species, multiple escape responses are exhibited with different movements. It has been reported that the approaching speed of a predator is important in choosing which escape action to take among the multiple responses. However, it is unknown whether other aspects of sensory stimuli, that indicate the predators approach, affect the selection of escape responses. We focused on two distinct escape responses (running and jumping) to a stimulus (short airflow) in crickets and examined the effects of multiple stimulus aspects (including the angle, velocity, and duration) on the choice between these escape responses. We found that the faster and longer the airflow, the more frequently the crickets jumped, meaning that they could choose their escape response depending on both velocity and duration of the stimulus. This result suggests that the neural basis for choosing escape responses includes the integration process of multiple stimulus parameters. It was also found that the moving speed and distance changed depending on the stimulus velocity and duration during running but not during jumping, suggesting higher adaptability of the running escape. In contrast, the movement direction was accurately controlled regardless of the stimulus parameters in both responses. The escape direction depended only on stimulus orientation, but not on velocity and duration. Summary statementWhen air currents triggering escape are faster and longer, crickets more frequently jump than run. Running speed and distance depend on stimulus velocity and duration, but direction control is independent.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Trait-specific responses to repeated stressor exposure in wild crickets
Emily Gilford, Ruonan Li, … Bram Kuijper·Animal BehaviourPeer-reviewed·May 23, 2026
- Convergent escape behavior from distinct visual processing of impending collision in fish and grasshoppers
Richard Burkett Dewell, Terri Carroll‐Mikhail, … Fabrizio Gabbiani·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2023
- Escaping from multiple visual threats: Modulation of escape responses in Pacific staghorn sculpin (Leptocottus armatus).
H. Kimura, T. Pfalzgraff, … P. Domenici·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2021
- Reef fish escape responses selectively match predator attack speeds
Sara Linde Neven, Lena Faber, Benjamin T. Martin·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2026
- Spy Crickets: Use (or not) of heterospecific acoustic cues for anti-predator responses
Piper K Zander, Ned A. Dochtermann·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2026
- Speed dependent descending control of innate freezing behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
Ricardo Zacarias, Shigehiro Namiki, … Marta A. P. Moita·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2018