Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Reactive and predictive processes during unpredictable driving collisions in virtual reality: an exploratory immersive study with multimodal neurophysiological monitoring

Cédric CannardiD, Demet Yeşi̇lbaşiD

Abstract

Anticipatory neurophysiological activity before unpredictable emotional events has been reported for decades, but the effects are small, difficult to replicate, and obtained almost exclusively in stripped-down laboratory paradigms. Whether they reflect genuine predictive processes or methodological artifacts remains debated; one rarely tested possibility is that such settings mute it. We examined anticipation in an immersive virtual reality (VR) driving simulation whose collision outcomes were assigned by a quantum random number generator, while EEG, photoplethysmography (PPG), EMG, EOG and inertial (IMU) signals were recorded from a single wireless dry-electrode headset built into the VR display. Sixteen participants passively observed 120 driving sequences ending in a collision or no collision. Length-matched pre- and post-stimulus windows were analysed identically with mass-univariate hierarchical general linear models under permutation cluster correction, plus machine-learning classification across held-out participants. Two post-stimulus clusters differentiated the conditions, the largest peaking at 451.6 ms (d = -1.35), with broadband power modulation robust to baseline modelling, decoded from held-out participants with up to 93.8% accuracy. No time-domain effect or decodable information preceded stimulus onset, but a broadband spectral difference did, surviving preregistered controls for expectation bias (run length), time-on-task build-up and ocular or facial-muscle artifact: directionally consistent in 13 of 15 participants, with pre- and post-stimulus power coupled in all 16. Heart rate differentiated the conditions neither alone nor when added to the classifier. The study was preregistered; the BIDS-format data, analysis code and an open-source EEGLAB plugin are publicly available.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHofmann '21Porssut '23Fourcade '24Fondón '25Karpov '24Kuziek '20
64% semantic matchNeuroscience
S. Hofmann, Felix Klotzsche, Alberto Mariola+3 more·eLife·Oct 28, 2021· 89 citations