From Peaks to Power: Systematic Evaluation of Chromatographic Sampling Reveals Determinants of Quantification and Biological Discovery in DIA Proteomics

Abstract

Modern DIA proteomics increasingly emphasizes throughput and depth for large-cohort studies, but methods are often optimized using proxy metrics that can mask losses in quantifiable signal and statistical power. Here, we evaluate how datapoints per peak and other chromatographic features jointly contribute to quantification and downstream biological discovery. Using a matrix-matched calibration curve dataset, we checked how the number of datapoints per peak (DPPP) affects the limits of detection and quantification (LOD/LOQ). Reduced DPPP minimally affected LOD but substantially degraded LOQ. Feature modeling and nonparametric association analyses identified precursor peak area as the strongest feature-level predictor of LOQ, whereas DPPP showed weaker and context-dependent effects. Simulations of chromatographic peak integration recapitulated these trends, showing that increased sampling primarily improves integration precision, while quantitative accuracy is strongly governed by peak height and peak shape. Finally, when comparing 20 cancer vs 20 control plasma samples processed with Seer Proteograph, the decrease in DPPP led to a loss of statistical significance for proteins with low-abundance precursors. These findings argue that DIA optimization should prioritize LOQ and statistical power metrics - not identifications alone - by balancing sampling density with chromatographic peak height and quality to maximize useful biological signal.