Life Science AllianceCell BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Predicting cell cycle stage from 3D single-cell nuclear-stained images
Gang LiiD, Eva K. NicholsiD, Valentino E. BrowningiD, Nicolas J. Longhi, Madison Sanchez-FormaniD, Conor K. CamplissoniD, Brian J. BeliveauiD, William Stafford NobleiD
Abstract
The cell cycle governs the proliferation, differentiation, and regeneration of all eukaryotic cells. Profiling cell cycle dynamics is therefore central to basic and biomedical research spanning development, health, aging, and disease. However, current approaches to cell cycle profiling involve complex interventions that may confound experimental interpretation. To facilitate more efficient cell cycle annotation of microscopy data, we developed CellCycleNet, a machine learning (ML) workflow designed to simplify cell cycle staging with minimal experimenter intervention and cost. CellCycleNet accurately predicts cell cycle phase using only a fluorescent nuclear stain (DAPI) in fixed interphase cells. Using the Fucci2a cell cycle reporter system as ground truth, we collected two benchmarking image datasets and trained two ML models--a support vector machine (SVM) and a deep neural network--to classify nuclei as being in either the G1 or S/G2 phases of the cell cycle. Our results suggest that CellCycleNet outperforms state-of-the-art SVM models on each dataset individually. When trained on two image datasets simultaneously, CellCycleNet achieves the highest classification accuracy, with an improvement in AUROC of 0.08-0.09. The model also demonstrates excellent generalization across different microscopes, achieving an AUROC of 0.95. Overall, using features derived from 3D images, rather than 2D projections of those same images, significantly improves classification performance. We have released our image data, trained models, and software as a community resource.
- assay: fluorescence / live-cell microscopy
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: deep learning
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Field percentile
- top 40%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cell cycle stage classification using phase imaging with computational specificity
Y. He, S. He, … G. Popescu·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2021
- END-TO-END CLASSIFICATION OF CELL-CYCLE STAGES WITH CENTER-CELL FOCUS TRACKER USING RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS
Abin Jose, Rijo Roy, … Johannes Stegmaier·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2022
- Automatic Detection of Cell-cycle Stages using Recurrent Neural Networks
Abin Jose, Rijo Roy, … Johannes Stegmaier·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2024
- A Deep Learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data
Thomas Bonte, Oriane Pourcelot, … Thomas Walter·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 11, 2025
- Weakly-supervised temporal segmentation of cell-cycle stages with center-cell focus using Recurrent Neural Networks
Abin Jose, Rijo Roy, Johannes Stegmaier·Informatik aktuellPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Deep learning tools and modeling to estimate the temporal expression of cell cycle proteins from 2D still images
Thierry Pécot, Maria C. Cuitiño, … Gustavo W. Leone·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 14, 2022