Brain stimulationNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Deep brain stimulation device-specific artefacts in MEG recordings
Bahne H. BahnersiD, Roxanne LofrediiD, Tilmann H. SanderiD, Alfons SchnitzleriD, Andrea A. KühniD, Esther FloriniD
Abstract
BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) has strong beneficial effects for treating movement disorders. The related cortical mechanisms can be studied with magnetoencephalography (MEG) during active DBS. However, MEG is prone to artefacts induced by the electrical stimulation and the movement of ferromagnetic DBS components. Although artefacts might vary between DBS devices from different manufacturers, no such comparison has been performed. To date, no combined MEG-DBS studies have been conducted within Yokogawa MEG systems. ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to compare DBS artefacts in MEG phantom recordings acquired with two MEG systems (Neuromag, Yokogawa) using DBS devices from three different manufacturers (Abbott, Boston Scientifc, Medtronic) and to test whether established cleaning methods can sufficiently reduce artefacts. MethodsDBS devices, electrodes, and extension cables were attached to a gelatine MEG phantom, and data was acquired in a Neuromag and a Yokogawa MEG system. ResultsThere are device-specific differences in movement-related artefacts with weaker artefacts for Boston Scientific (BSC) devices. Stimulation-, movement- and IPG-related artefacts are best cleaned when combining the ICA-MI and Hampel filter across recordings and DBS devices. However, the cleaning of movement-related artefacts can result in artefactual spectral peaks in physiologically relevant frequencies below 20 Hz. ConclusionsDevice-specific IPG-related artefacts have to be considered for MEG-DBS studies and can be cleaned with combinations of published cleaning methods for MEG and EEG data. Critically, cleaning movement-related artefacts can potentially result in spectral peaks, which resemble physiological activity. Finally, combined MEG-DBS recordings are feasible in Yokogawa-MEG systems.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Field percentile
- top 16%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Combining Magnetoencephalography with Telemetric Streaming of Intracranial Recordings and Deep Brain Stimulation - a Feasibility Study
Mansoureh Fahimi Hnazaee, Matthias Sure, … Vladimir Litvak A·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2023
- Artifacts can be deceiving: The actual location of deep brain stimulation electrodes differs from the artifact seen on magnetic resonance images
Noa B Nuzov, Bhumi Bhusal, … Laleh Golestanirad·Stereotactic and Functional NeurosurgeryPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2022
- Estimation of Periodic Signals with Applications to Deep Brain Stimulation
Paula X. Chen, Taewoo Kim, … Jérôme Darbon·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Stimulation related artifacts and a multipurpose template-based offline removal solution for a novel sensing-enabled deep brain stimulation device
Lauren H. Hammer, Ryan B. Kochanski, … Simon J Little·Stereotactic and Functional NeurosurgeryPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Robust Removal of Slow Artifactual Dynamics Induced by Deep Brain Stimulation in Local Field Potential Recordings using SVD-based Adaptive Filtering
Nooshin Bahador, Josh Saha, … Milad Lankarany·BioengineeringPeer-reviewed·Jun 14, 2023
- Remote Deep Brain Stimulation by Transgene-free Magnetomechanical Approach
Chih-Lun Su, Chao‐Chun Cheng, … Po‐Han Chiang·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2022