Stereotactic and Functional NeurosurgeryNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Artifacts can be deceiving: The actual location of deep brain stimulation electrodes differs from the artifact seen on magnetic resonance images
Noa B NuzoviD, Bhumi BhusaliD, Kaylee R. HenryiD, Fuchang JiangiD, Jasmine VuiD, Joshua M. RosenowiD, Julie G. PilitsisiD, Behzad ElahiiD, Laleh GolestaniradiD
Abstract
IntroductionDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is a common treatment for a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Recent studies have highlighted the role of neuroimaging in localizing the position of electrode contacts relative to target brain areas in order to optimize DBS programming. Among different imaging methods, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used for DBS electrode localization; however, the geometrical distortion induced by the lead limits its accuracy. In this work, we investigated to what degree the difference between the actual location of the leads tip and the location of the tip estimated from the MRI artifact varies depending on the MRI sequence parameters such as acquisition plane and phase encoding direction, as well as the leads extracranial configuration. Accordingly, an imaging technique to increase the accuracy of lead localization was devised and discussed. MethodsWe designed and constructed an anthropomorphic phantom with an implanted DBS system following 18 clinically relevant configurations. The phantom was scanned at a Siemens 1.5 Tesla Aera scanner using a T1MPRAGE sequence optimized for clinical use and a T1TSE sequence optimized for research purposes. We varied slice acquisition plane and phase encoding direction and calculated the distance between the caudal tip of the DBS lead MRI artifact and the actual tip of the lead, as estimated from MRI reference markers. ResultsImaging parameters and lead configuration substantially altered the difference in the depth of the lead within its MRI artifact on the scale of several millimeters - with a difference as large as 4.99 millimeters. The actual tip of the DBS lead was found to be consistently more rostral than the tip estimated from the MR image artifact. The smallest difference between the tip of the DBS lead and the tip of the MRI artifact using the clinically relevant sequence (i.e., T1MPRAGE) was found with the sagittal acquisition plane and anterior-posterior phase encoding direction. Discussion/ConclusionThe actual tip of an implanted DBS lead is located up to several millimeters rostral to the tip of the leads artifact on postoperative MR images. This distance depends on the MRI sequence parameters and the DBS systems extracranial trajectory. MRI parameters may be altered to improve this localization.
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Field percentile
- top 28%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deep Brain Stimulation: Imaging on a group level
Svenja Treu, Bryan Andrew Strange, … Andreas Horn·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2020
- Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging
Andreas Horn, Ningfei Li, … Andrea A. Kühn·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2018
- Electroencephalography for Radiation-Free Orientation Estimation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads
S. Maiti, A. Bince Jacob, … V. Litvak·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2024
- The effect of device configuration and patient body composition on image artifact and RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices during MRI at 1.5T and 3T
B. Bhusal, B. T. Nguyen, … L. Golestani Rad·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2020
- In Vivo Localization of Deep Brain Implants in Mice
Bálint Király, Diána Balázsfi, … Balázs Hangya·bioRxiv·Mar 28, 2020
- Reconfigurable MRI coil technology can substantially reduce RF heating at the tips of bilateral deep brain stimulation implants
L. Golestanirad, B. Keil, … L. L. Wald·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2018