bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Client-server interfaces enable efficient agent-driven variant calling
Xian YuiD, Zhenxian ZhengiD, Lei CheniD, Zilan QiniD, X S GuoiD, Minggao HeiD, Ruibang LuoiD
Abstract
BackgroundLarge language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate bioinformatics analyses, but most existing bioinformatics tools were built for standalone use by human experts. An agent driving such a tool must reason about its installation, configuration, and execution from documentation for human, spending many turns, tokens, and tool calls per result. How a method is exposed to an agent can therefore matter as much as the method itself. By designing agentic interfaces for these tools, agent can reduce such overhead and improve the reliability of agent-driven analyses. FindingsTo test this design, we re-architected Clair3, a widely used deep-learning-based long-read variant caller, into a client-server system, Clair3-Connect. The client performs all genomics related processing and holds the identifiable data. The server runs only neural-network inference, and the client sends only feature tensors to the server, while sample identifiers and genomic context remain on the client. The client exposes schema-defined agent-facing tools that an agent invokes through single structured calls. On an APOE diplotyping task, all 60 agent runs were correct. The agentic tools used 12K tokens in 3 turns, 6.8 to 14 times fewer tokens than the shell-driven baselines (81K-163K tokens), at about a quarter the wall-clock time and far more stably (4% versus 35% token usage variation). Dropping the pileup and phasing stages to keep the client light left SNP F1 within 0.1-0.3 points of standard Clair3 by 50x coverage, while mutual TLS and AES-256-GCM encryption added 7.2% to end-to-end runtime. ConclusionsRecasting an established algorithm as developer-built, agentic tools behind a secure client-server boundary makes it more efficient, reliable, and easier to deploy for an LLM agent than a third-party wrapper, which cannot recover the defaults and conventions only its developers know. Agentic interfaces should be a first-class deliverable of bioinformatics tool development.
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating open LLMs for agentic analysis orchestration in a typical biomedical lab
Anton Nekrutenko·bioRxiv·May 18, 2026
- PromptBio-Bench: Benchmarking LLM-based Bioinformatics Agents for End-to-End Data Analysis
Wenbin Guo, Minzhe Zhang, … Shashi Dhar·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2026
- BioClaw: Human-Bot Research Collaboration Ecosystems in Group Chats
Mingyang Xu, Jiaxian Yan, … Zaixi Zhang·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2026
- Skill-Augmented Frontier Agents Nearly Saturate BixBench-Verified-50
Xiaoyu Zhang·bioRxiv·May 1, 2026
- Open-Rosalind: Tool-First Biomedical LLM Agents with Process-Aware Benchmarking
Liang Wang·bioRxiv·May 8, 2026
- BioGAIP: A Scalable, User-Friendly and Robust LLM-Powered Multi-Agent System for Automated Bioinformatics Tasks
Jiayu Zhang, Pengfei Guo, … Ting Ni·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026