PELP: accounting for missing data in neural time series by Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets
Evan M. Dastin-van RijniD, Nicole R. ProvenzaiD, Gregory S. VogtiD, Michelle Avendaño-Ortega, Sameer Anil ShethiD, Wayne K. GoodmaniD, Matthew Tom HarrisoniD, David A. BortoniD
Abstract
ObjectiveImplanted electrical stimulators with sensing capabilities have enabled the development of closed-loop neuromodulation therapies capable of responding to patient needs in real-time. Through a combination of rechargeable technologies and wireless data transmission, it is now possible for researchers to acquire extensive neural recordings from human participants in naturalistic settings using these bidirectional devices. However, data losses during wireless transmission hamper processing and the identification of neural signals of interest, driving the need for methodologies to properly estimate the impact of data loss. ApproachTo accurately reconstruct the timing of data containing losses, we have developed a method called Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets (PELP) to precisely determine the number of samples lost from implanted recordings during active stimulation. PELP leverages a data-driven procedure for determining the period of stimulation and the knowledge that stimulation continues identically during periods where data are missing to accurately account for the number of samples lost. Main resultsUsing simulated stimulation added to collected human EEG data, we show that PELP is robust to a range of stimulation waveforms and noise characteristics. Lastly, we successfully applied PELP to local field potential (LFP) recordings from an implanted, bidirectional device using data recorded in the clinic and the patients own home. SignificanceBy effectively accounting for the timing of missing data, PELP enables the analysis of complex, naturalistic neural time series data from bidirectional implanted devices aiding in the development of novel therapeutic approaches. NCT04806516 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Field percentile
- 47th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How do packet losses affect measures of averaged neural signals?
E. Dastin-van Rijn, M. Harrison, D. A. Borton·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2021
- A comparison of methods to suppress electrocardiographic artifacts in local field potential recordings
Mariëlle J. Stam, Bernadette C.M. van Wijk, … Arthur W.G. Buijink·Clinical NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Uncovering biomarkers during therapeutic neuromodulation with PARRM: Period-based Artifact Reconstruction and Removal Method
Evan M. Dastin-van Rijn, Nicole R. Provenza, … David A. Borton·Cell Reports MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Estimation of Periodic Signals with Applications to Deep Brain Stimulation
Paula X. Chen, Taewoo Kim, … Jérôme Darbon·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- High-Precision Event Synchronization for Chronic Deep Brain Stimulation Local Field Potential Recordings
Sophia Sophia Gimple, Yasin Temel, … Marcus L.F. Janssen·bioRxiv·May 15, 2026
- Pulsatile electrical stimulation creates predictable, correctable disruptions in neural firing
Cynthia R. Steinhardt, Diana E. Mitchell, … Gene Y. Fridman·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2021