BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
GeoWaVe: Geometric median clustering with weighted voting for ensemble clustering of cytometry data
Ross J. BurtoniD, Simone M. CuffiD, Matt P. G. MorganiD, Andreas ArtemiouiD, Matthias EberliD
Abstract
MotivationClustering is an unsupervised method for identifying structure in unlabelled data. In the context of cytometry, is typically used to categorise cells into subpopulations of similar phenotype. However, clustering is greatly dependent on hyperparameters and the data to which it is applied as each algorithm makes different assumptions and generates a different view of the dataset. As such, the choice of clustering algorithm can significantly influence results, and there is often not one preferred method but different insights to be obtained from different methods. To overcome these limitations, consensus approaches are needed that directly address the effect of competing algorithms, which to our knowledge has not been applied to cytometry. ResultsWe present a novel ensemble clustering methodology based on geometric median clustering with weighted voting (GeoWaVe). Compared to graph ensemble clustering methods that have gained popularity in scRNA-seq analysis, GeoWaVe performed favourably on different sets of high-dimensional mass and flow cytometry data. Our findings provide proof of concept for the power of consensus methods to make the analysis, visualisation and interpretation of cytometry data more robust and reproducible. The wide availability of ensemble clustering methods is likely to have a profound impact on our understanding of cellular responses, clinical conditions, and therapeutic and diagnostic options. Availability and implementationGeoWaVe is available as part of the CytoCluster package https://github.com/burtonrj/CytoCluster. ContactRoss.Burton@wales.nhs.uk
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Field percentile
- top 37%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of Clustering Methods for High-Dimensional Single-Cell Flow and Mass Cytometry Data
Lukas M. Weber, Mark D. Robinson·Cytometry Part APeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2016
- The impact of similarity metrics on cell type clustering in highly multiplexed in situ imaging cytometry data
Elijah Willie, Pengyi Yang, Ellis Patrick·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Comprehensive evaluation and practical guideline of gating methods for high-dimensional cytometry data: manual gating, unsupervised clustering, and auto-gating
Peng Liu, Yuchen Pan, … Silvia Liu·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2024
- Model-based cell clustering and population tracking for time-series flow cytometry data
Kodai Minoura, Ko Abe, … Teppei Shimamura·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019
- ImmunoCluster: A computational framework for the non-specialist to profile cellular heterogeneity in cytometry datasets
James W. Opzoomer, Jessica Ann Timms, … Shahram Y. Kordasti·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2021
- A cluster-aware, weighted ensemble clustering method for cell-type detection
Daphne M. Tsoucas, Guo‐Cheng Yuan·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2018