henhaobio
Sign in

BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

From Atoms to Fragments: A Coarse Representation for Efficient and Functional Protein Design

Leonardo V. CastorinaiD, Christopher W. WoodiD, Kartic SubriD

PDFDOIPreprintCode

Abstract

MotivationAlthough deep learning has accelerated protein design, current protein representations such as sequences or full-atom structures scale non-linearly with protein length. We propose a sparse and interpretable representation for proteins, based on evolutionarily conserved fragments. Specifically, we use a curated set of 40 functional and evolutionarily conserved fragments as an alphabet to build Fragment Graphs and Fragment Sets. These fragment-based representations are both lightweight and functionally informative, capturing up to 55% more variance using fewer than [Formula] of the dimensions required by traditional methods. ResultsOn a dataset of 215 functionally diverse proteins, our approach creates more coherent functional clusters than traditional sequence- and structure-based methods, even among proteins with [≤] 30% sequence identity. Fragment-based searches of protein databases achieve accuracies comparable to traditional methods, while using 90% fewer tokens per protein. These searches execute [~]68.7x faster than RMSD-based structural methods and [~]1.64x faster than sequence-based methods, even including fragment pre-processing overhead. Additionally, we show that our representation effectively guides RFDiffusion for protein backbone generation with functional recovery rates higher than 40%. In summary, our fragment-based representation offers a scalable and interpretable alternative for the next generation of protein design tools for backbone design, sequence design, and functional similarity searches within protein structure databases. Availabilityhttps://github.com/wells-wood-research/tessera (Documentation to be made available upon acceptance)

Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
0th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLiu '18Correia '24Lin '23Wang '24Bai '26Pearce '23
68% semantic matchBioinformatics
Yang Liu, Qing Ye, Liwei Wang+1 more·Bioinformatics·Jul 20, 2018· 36 citations