Sign in
NeuroscienceCurrent Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Preparatory attention incorporates contextual expectations

Surya GayetiD, Marius V. PeeleniD

Abstract

Humans are remarkably proficient at finding objects within a complex visual world. Current theories of attentional selection propose that this ability is mediated by target-specific preparatory activity in visual cortex, biasing visual processing in favor of the target object. In real-world situations, however, the retinal image that any object will produce is unknown in advance; its size, for instance, varies dramatically with the objects distance from the observer. Using fMRI, we show that preparatory activity is systematically modulated by expectations derived from scene context. Human participants searched for objects at different distances in scenes. Activity patterns in object-selective cortex during search preparation (while no objects were presented), resembled activity patterns evoked by viewing targets object in isolation. Crucially, this preparatory activity was modulated by distance, reflecting the predicted retinal image of the object at each distance. These findings reconcile current theories of attentional selection with the challenges of real-world vision. HighlightsO_LIVisual cortex contains object-specific representations during search preparation. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate this for the first time during concurrent visual scene processing. C_LIO_LIPreparatory object representations are scaled to account for viewing distance. C_LIO_LIPreparatory biases reflect the predicted retinal image inferred from scene context. C_LI eTOC blurbAttentional selection is thought to be mediated by target-specific preparatory activity in visual cortex. Gayet and Peelen provide evidence that such preparatory biases incorporate contextual expectations about object appearance, reconciling attention theories with the challenges of naturalistic vision.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
40
FWCI
3.02
Field percentile
top 8%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLerebourg '24Bouwkamp '24Caplette '20Chen '25Bouwkamp '26Meghdadi '21
81% semantic matchNeuroscience
Maëlle Lerebourg, Floris P. de Lange, Marius V. Peelen·Science Advances·Oct 11, 2024· 11 citations