Nature CommunicationsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Ensuring scientific reproducibility in bio-macromolecular modeling via extensive, automated benchmarks
Julia Koehler LemaniD, Sergey LyskoviD, Steven Macauley LewisiD, Jared Adolf‐BryfogleiD, Rebecca F. AlfordiD, Kyle A. BarlowiD, Ziv Ben-AharoniD, Daniel P. FarrelliD, Jason S. FelliD, William A. Hansen, Ameya HarmalkariD, Jeliazko R. JeliazkoviD, Georg KuenzeiD, Justyna Dorota KryśiD, Ajasja LjubetičiD, Amanda L. LoshbaughiD, Jack B. MaguireiD, Rocco MorettiiD, Vikram Khipple MulliganiD, Morgan L. NanceiD, Phuong T. NguyeniD, Shane Ó Conchúir, Shourya S. Roy BurmaniD, Rituparna SamantaiD, Shannon T. SmithiD, , Richard BonneauiD
- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Abstract
Each year vast international resources are wasted on irreproducible research. The scientific community has been slow to adopt standard software engineering practices, despite the increases in high-dimensional data, complexities of workflows, and computational environments. Here we show how scientific software applications can be created in a reproducible manner when simple design goals for reproducibility are met. We describe the implementation of a test server framework and 40 scientific benchmarks, covering numerous applications in Rosetta bio-macromolecular modeling. High performance computing cluster integration allows these benchmarks to run continuously and automatically. Detailed protocol captures are useful for developers and users of Rosetta and other macromolecular modeling tools. The framework and design concepts presented here are valuable for developers and users of any type of scientific software and for the scientific community to create reproducible methods. Specific examples highlight the utility of this framework and the comprehensive documentation illustrates the ease of adding new tests in a matter of hours.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A workflow reproducibility scale for automatic validation of biological interpretation results.
Hirotaka Suetake, Tsukasa Fukusato, … Tazro Ohta·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 28, 2022
- Experimenting with reproducibility in bioinformatics
Yang-Min Kim, Jean‐Baptiste Poline, Guillaume Dumas·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2018
- Horus: Reproducible Workflow Manager for Biomolecular Modelling
Christian Domínguez-Dalmases, Albert Cañellas-Solé, … Vı́ctor Guallar·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2025
- Countering reproducibility issues in mathematical models with software engineering techniques: A case study using a one-dimensional mathematical model of the atrioventricular node
Christopher Schölzel, Valeria Blesius, … Andreas Dominik·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2021
- Lessons Learned: Recommendations for Establishing Critical Periodic Scientific Benchmarking
Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez, Diana de la Iglesia, … Alfonso Valencia·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2017
- Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility
Stephen R Piccolo, Michael B Frampton·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2016