A subfunctionalization epistasis model to evaluate homeologous gene interactions in allopolyploid wheat
Nicholas SantantonioiD, Jean‐Luc JanninkiD, Mark E. SorrellsiD
Abstract
1Hybridization between related species results in the formation of an allopolyploid with multiple subgenomes. These subgenomes will each contain complete, yet evolutionarily divergent, sets of genes. Like a diploid hybrid, allopolyploids will have two versions, or homeoalleles, for every gene. Partial functional redundancy between homeologous genes should result in a deviation from additivity. These epistatic interactions between homeoalleles are analogous to dominance effects, but are fixed across subgenomes through self pollination. An allopolyploid can be viewed as an immortalized hybrid, with the opportunity to select and fix favorable homeoallelic interactions within inbred varieties. We present a subfunctionalization epistasis model to estimate the degree of functional redundancy between homeoallelic loci and a statistical framework to determine their importance within a population. We provide an example using the homeologous dwarfing genes of allohexaploid wheat, Rht-1, and search for genome-wide patterns indicative of homeoallelic subfunctionalization in a breeding population. Using the IWGSC RefSeq vl.0 sequence, 23,796 homeoallelic gene sets were identified and anchored to the nearest DNA marker to form 10,172 homeologous marker sets. Interaction predictors constructed from products of marker scores were used to fit the homeologous main and interaction effects, as well as estimate whole genome genetic values. Some traits displayed a pattern indicative of homeoallelic subfunctionalization, while other traits showed a less clear pattern or were not affected. Using genomic prediction accuracy to evaluate importance of marker interactions, we show that homeologous interactions explain a portion of the non-additive genetic signal, but are less important than other epistatic interactions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Prediction of subgenome additive and interaction effects in allohexaploid wheat
Nicholas Santantonio, Jean‐Luc Jannink, Mark E. Sorrells·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2018
- Improving genomic selection in hexaploid wheat with sub-genome additive and epistatic models
Augusto Tessele, David O. González-Diéguez, … Allan K. Fritz·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2025
- New insights into homoeologous copy number variations in the hexaploid wheat genome
Caroline Juéry, Lorenzo Concia, … Etienne Paux·The Plant GenomePeer-reviewed·Nov 5, 2020
- HomoeoGWAS enables experiment-wide homoeolog-group interaction mapping in allopolyploid crops
Cheng Si, Yujiang Wu, … Shipeng Yang·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2026
- Nonadditive gene expression and reduced homoeolog expression bias in an intraspecific hexaploid wheat hybrid
Asena Ardaman, Cristiane Forgiarini, Ramesh Arunkumar·BMC Plant BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2026
- Polyploidization enhancing genetic recombination of the ancestral diploid genome in the evolution of hexaploid wheat