Sign in
GeneticsGenetics
Peer-reviewed journal article

A subfunctionalization epistasis model to evaluate homeologous gene interactions in allopolyploid wheat

Nicholas SantantonioiD, Jean‐Luc JanninkiD, Mark E. SorrellsiD

Abstract

1Hybridization between related species results in the formation of an allopolyploid with multiple subgenomes. These subgenomes will each contain complete, yet evolutionarily divergent, sets of genes. Like a diploid hybrid, allopolyploids will have two versions, or homeoalleles, for every gene. Partial functional redundancy between homeologous genes should result in a deviation from additivity. These epistatic interactions between homeoalleles are analogous to dominance effects, but are fixed across subgenomes through self pollination. An allopolyploid can be viewed as an immortalized hybrid, with the opportunity to select and fix favorable homeoallelic interactions within inbred varieties. We present a subfunctionalization epistasis model to estimate the degree of functional redundancy between homeoallelic loci and a statistical framework to determine their importance within a population. We provide an example using the homeologous dwarfing genes of allohexaploid wheat, Rht-1, and search for genome-wide patterns indicative of homeoallelic subfunctionalization in a breeding population. Using the IWGSC RefSeq vl.0 sequence, 23,796 homeoallelic gene sets were identified and anchored to the nearest DNA marker to form 10,172 homeologous marker sets. Interaction predictors constructed from products of marker scores were used to fit the homeologous main and interaction effects, as well as estimate whole genome genetic values. Some traits displayed a pattern indicative of homeoallelic subfunctionalization, while other traits showed a less clear pattern or were not affected. Using genomic prediction accuracy to evaluate importance of marker interactions, we show that homeologous interactions explain a portion of the non-additive genetic signal, but are less important than other epistatic interactions.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
18
FWCI
2.21
Field percentile
top 14%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSantantonio '18Tessele '25Juéry '20Si '26Ardaman '26Wan '20
81% semantic matchGenetics
Nicholas Santantonio, Jean‐Luc Jannink, Mark E. Sorrells·G3 Genes Genomes Genetics·Nov 19, 2018· 14 citations