bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Barcode Crosstalk in ONT Multiplex Sequencing: Quantification and Mitigation Strategies
Sebastian Alexander ScharfiD, Philipp SpohriD, Max RIEDiD, R. Haas, Gunnar W. KlauiD, Birgit HenrichiD, Klaus PfefferiD
Abstract
Multiplexing samples in long-read sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Next Generation Sequencing Technology (ONT) by ligating specific native barcodes to individual DNA samples enables significant increases of high throughput sequencing combined with a significant reduction of sequencing costs. However, this advantage carries the risk of barcode misassignment / crosstalk. Employing ONT multiplex sequencing with samples, we observed misassigned barcodes so called barcode crosstalk, after ONT library preparation according to the standard protocol, particularly in samples with low input DNA concentrations. We assumed that these barcode misassignments are largely due to misligation of remaining native barcodes during subsequent the subsequent sequencing adapter ligation. To systematically investigate and quantify barcode crosstalk, genomic DNA (gDNA) from four bacterial type strains with different DNA input concentrations was prepared using three protocols for library preparation: the Nanopore standard protocol (protocol A: version valid until July 2, 2025) the new Nanopore protocol (protocol B: version from July 2, 2025), and an in house protocol with pooling of the barcoded samples only after the sequencing adapter ligation step (protocol C: in house). All samples were sequenced on a Nanopore PromethIon device. The results clearly showed that the use of protocol A resulted in a pronounced barcode crosstalk especially detectable in samples with low DNA input concentrations (up to 2.4% misassigned reads). The ONT adjustment in protocol B (altered washing buffer vs. protocol A) significantly alleviated the barcode crosstalk to below 0.01%, whereas protocol C eliminated barcode crosstalk virtually completely. These observations emphasize that sequencing results obtained with older ONT native barcoding protocol variants should be critically reviewed. The newer ONT barcoding protocol is preferable for sequencing, but it does not completely eliminate the barcode crosstalk effect. In conclusion, for low DNA input and high accuracy sequencing, protocol C is recommended.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: long-read sequencing
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification, quantification, and elimination of barcode crosstalk in multiplexed Oxford Nanopore sequencing
Qing Dai, Claudia K. Gunsch, Joshua A. Granek·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2025
- Barbell Resolves Demultiplexing and Trimming Issues in Nanopore Data
Rick Beeloo, Ragnar Groot Koerkamp, … Bas E. Dutilh·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2025
- Residual barcode-like sequences and barcode-associated artifacts after Dorado and Barbell preprocessing of metagenomic reads
Timo Dinse, Vincent Robin Englaender, … David Alexander Christian Messerer·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2026
- Real-Time Demultiplexing Nanopore Barcoded Sequencing Data With npBarcode
Son Hoang Nguyen, Tânia Duarte, … Minh Duc Cao·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 23, 2017
- Detection of viral pathogens with multiplex Nanopore MinION sequencing: be careful with cross-talk
Yifei Xu, Kuiama S. Lewandowski, … Derrick W. Crook·Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2018
- Barcoding and demultiplexing Oxford Nanopore native RNA sequencing reads with deep residual learning
Martin A. Smith, Tansel Ersavas, … Eva Maria Novoa·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2020