Acute effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on postural control of trained athletes: a randomized controlled trial
Mary Giancatarina, Yohan GrandperriniD, Magali NicolieriD, Philippe Gimenez, Chrystelle Vidal, Grégory TioiD, Émmanuel HaffeniD, Djamila BennabiiD, Sidney GrosprêtreiD
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used to modulate the brain function in targeted brain areas, and can acutely modulate motor control, such as postural control. While the acute effect of tDCS is well documented on patients, little is still known whether tDCS can alter the motor control of healthy populations with an already high level of motor skills. This study aimed to assess the acute effect of tDCS on postural control of trained athletes. Eighteen parkour practitioners, known for their good balance abilities, were tested on three occasions in the laboratory for each stimulation condition (2 mA ; 20 minutes) - primary motor cortex (M1), prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and sham (placebo). Postural control was evaluated PRE and POST each stimulation by measuring Center of Pressure (CoP) displacements on a force platform during static conditions (bipedal and unipedal stance). Following M1 stimulation, significant decreases were observed in CoP area in unipedal (P=0.003) and bipedal (P<0.001) stances. As well, the CoP total length was significantly reduced in bipodal (P=0.005) as well as in unipedal stance (P<0.001), only after M1 stimulation. Relative pre-post changes observed after M1 stimulation were negatively correlated to experience in parkour only after unipedal stance (r=0.715, P<0.001), meaning that the more participants were trained the less tDCS was effective. No significant changes were noticed after sham and dlPFC stimulation. These results suggested that the modulation of gait performance in athletes following an acute intervention of tDCS is specific to the targeted brain region, and that more complex postures (such as unipedal stance) were more sensitive to the effect of tDCS according to the level of practice.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Field percentile
- top 19%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcranial direct current stimulation does not improve performance in a whole-body movement task
Harriet Caesley, Isabella J. Sewell, … Amir‐Homayoun Javadi·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2021
- tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
Vishal Rawji, Matteo Ciocca, … Sven Bestmann·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2017
- The Effects of Unilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Unimanual Laparoscopic Peg-Transfer Task
Zaeem Hadi, Aysha Umbreen, … Muhammad Samran Navid·Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 8, 2021
- Use of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for improving motor performance in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Atsushi Sasaki, Takuya Ideriha, … Nobuhiro Hagura·bioRxiv·May 6, 2026
- Electric field dependent effects of motor cortical TDCS
Ilkka Laakso, Marko Mikkonen, … Satoshi Tanaka·bioRxiv·May 21, 2018
- Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: a consensus and critical position paper
Ethan R Buch, Emiliano Santarnecchi, … Leonardo G Cohen·Clinical NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2017