Quantification and site-specific analysis of co-occupied N- and O-glycopeptides
Joann ChongsaritsinsukiD, Valentina Rangel-AngaritaiD, Taryn M. LucasiD, Keira E. MahoneyiD, Olivia M. EnnyiD, Mitchelle KatemauswaiD, Stacy Alyse MalakeriD
Abstract
Protein glycosylation is a complex post-translational modification that is generally classified as N- or O-linked. Site-specific analysis of glycopeptides is accomplished with a variety of fragmentation methods, depending on the type of glycosylation being investigated and the instrumentation available. For instance, collisional dissociation methods are frequently used for N-glycoproteomic analysis with the assumption that one N-sequon exists per tryptic peptide. Alternatively, electron-based methods are indispensable for O-glycosite localization. However, the presence of simultaneously N- and O-glycosylated peptides could suggest the necessity of electron-based fragmentation methods for N-glycoproteomics, which is not commonly performed. Thus, we quantified the prevalence of N- and O-glycopeptides in mucins and other glycoproteins. A much higher frequency of co-occupancy within mucins was detected whereas only a negligible occurrence occurred within non-mucin glycoproteins. This was demonstrated from analyses of recombinant and/or purified proteins, as well as more complex samples. Where co-occupancy occurred, O-glycosites were frequently localized to the Ser/Thr within the N-sequon. Additionally, we found that O-glycans in close proximity to the occupied Asn were predominantly unelaborated core 1 structures, while those further away were more extended. Overall, we demonstrate electron-based methods are required for robust site-specific analysis of mucins, wherein co-occupancy is more prevalent. Conversely, collisional methods are generally sufficient for analyses of other types of glycoproteins. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=105 SRC="FIGDIR/small/602348v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b14908org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@131e812org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17b07cborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3cb199_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Field percentile
- top 17%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Chemoenzymatic Method for Glycoproteomic N-glycan Type Quantitation
Heng‐Hui Li, Leyuan Li, … Daniel Figeys·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Dec 6, 2019
- Evaluating the performance of photon- and electron-based fragmentation methods in Omnitrap-LCMS analysis of N-glycopeptides
Nikita Levin, Daniel A. Polasky, … Shabaz Mohammed·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2026
- Fast and Comprehensive N- and O-glycoproteomics analysis with MSFragger-Glyco
Daniel A. Polasky, Fengchao Yu, … Alexey I. Nesvizhskii·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Oct 5, 2020
- Electron-Activated Dissociation and Collision-Induced Dissociation Glycopeptide Fragmentation for Improved Glycoproteomics
Kyle L. Macauslane, Cassandra L. Pegg, … Benjamin Luke Schulz·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2024
- GlypNirO: An automated workflow for quantitative N- and O-linked glycoproteomic data analysis
Toan K. Phung, Cassandra L. Pegg, Benjamin Luke Schulz·Beilstein Journal of Organic ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2020
- O-Pair Search with MetaMorpheus for O-glycopeptide Characterization
Lei Lü, Nicholas McIlvain Riley, … Lloyd M. Smith·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2020