Sign in
BiochemistryJournal of Proteome Research
Peer-reviewed journal article

Quantification and site-specific analysis of co-occupied N- and O-glycopeptides

Joann ChongsaritsinsukiD, Valentina Rangel-AngaritaiD, Taryn M. LucasiD, Keira E. MahoneyiD, Olivia M. EnnyiD, Mitchelle KatemauswaiD, Stacy Alyse MalakeriD

Abstract

Protein glycosylation is a complex post-translational modification that is generally classified as N- or O-linked. Site-specific analysis of glycopeptides is accomplished with a variety of fragmentation methods, depending on the type of glycosylation being investigated and the instrumentation available. For instance, collisional dissociation methods are frequently used for N-glycoproteomic analysis with the assumption that one N-sequon exists per tryptic peptide. Alternatively, electron-based methods are indispensable for O-glycosite localization. However, the presence of simultaneously N- and O-glycosylated peptides could suggest the necessity of electron-based fragmentation methods for N-glycoproteomics, which is not commonly performed. Thus, we quantified the prevalence of N- and O-glycopeptides in mucins and other glycoproteins. A much higher frequency of co-occupancy within mucins was detected whereas only a negligible occurrence occurred within non-mucin glycoproteins. This was demonstrated from analyses of recombinant and/or purified proteins, as well as more complex samples. Where co-occupancy occurred, O-glycosites were frequently localized to the Ser/Thr within the N-sequon. Additionally, we found that O-glycans in close proximity to the occupied Asn were predominantly unelaborated core 1 structures, while those further away were more extended. Overall, we demonstrate electron-based methods are required for robust site-specific analysis of mucins, wherein co-occupancy is more prevalent. Conversely, collisional methods are generally sufficient for analyses of other types of glycoproteins. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=105 SRC="FIGDIR/small/602348v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b14908org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@131e812org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17b07cborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3cb199_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
13
FWCI
1.50
Field percentile
top 17%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLi '19Levin '26Polasky '20Macauslane '24Phung '20Lü '20
64% semantic matchSystems Biology
Heng‐Hui Li, Leyuan Li, Kai Cheng+8 more·Analytical Chemistry·Dec 6, 2019· 13 citations