Evaluating the performance of photon- and electron-based fragmentation methods in Omnitrap-LCMS analysis of N-glycopeptides
Nikita LeviniD, Daniel A. PolaskyiD, Kai Li, Alexey I. NesvizhskiiiD, Shabaz MohammediD
Abstract
To date, collision-induced dissociation and methods based on electron transfer dissociation are considered the standard approaches for the mass spectrometry analysis of N- and O-glycopeptides, respectively, allowing for identification of both peptide and glycan compositions. In recent years, alternative fragmentation methods such as ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) and more energetic versions of electron-based techniques (such as electron ionisation dissociation, EID) have been shown to be useful for the analysis of glycopeptides, producing rich information on the glycopeptide structure, including types of glycosidic linkages. We evaluated ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD), electron ionization dissociation (EID), electron capture dissociation (ECD), and activated-ion ECD (AI-ECD) using an Orbitrap-Omnitrap hybrid for LC-MS analysis of complex N-glycopeptides. Both UVPD and EID generated extensive peptide, glycosidic, and cross-ring fragments, enabling detailed structural characterization. While ECD alone produced few glycopeptide identifications, AI-ECD significantly improved yields through supplemental vibrational activation. UVPD and EID achieved comparable identification efficiencies to stepped collisional dissociation and provided additional linkage information. These results establish the Omnitrap as a powerful platform for comprehensive glycoproteomic analysis and highlight the need for enhanced computational tools to interpret complex UVPD and EID spectra.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Field percentile
- top 15%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Unifying N- and O-glycopeptide dissociation methods with expedient electron transfer dissociation
Haley M. Schramm, Tim S. Veth, … Nicholas McIlvain Riley·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026
- Electron-Activated Dissociation and Collision-Induced Dissociation Glycopeptide Fragmentation for Improved Glycoproteomics
Kyle L. Macauslane, Cassandra L. Pegg, … Benjamin Luke Schulz·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2024
- Glycan size and attachment site location affect electron transfer dissociation (ETD) fragmentation and automated glycopeptide identification
K. Alagesan, H. Hinneburg, … D. Kolarich·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2019
- IMPROVED N- AND O-GLYCOPEPTIDE IDENTIFICATION USING HIGH-FIELD ASYMMETRIC WAVEFORM ION MOBILITY SPECTROMETRY (FAIMS)
K. Alagesan, R. Ahmed-Begrich, E. Charpentier·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2022
- Expanding N-Glycopeptide Identifications by Fragmentation Prediction and Glycome Network Smoothing
Joshua Klein, Luis Eduardo Carvalho, Joseph Zaia·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2021
- Ghost fragment ions in structure and site-specific glycoproteomics analysis
D. Campos, M. A. Y. Girgis, … M. Sanda·bioRxiv·May 17, 2023