Ecology and EvolutionEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Loss or redistribution? A better way of estimating regional changes in animal distribution and numbers caused by increased human activities
Moritz MerckeriD, Verena PeschkoiD, Kai BorkenhageniD, Nele MarkonesiD, Henriette Schwemmer, Volker DierschkeiD, Stefan GartheiD
Abstract
O_LIA differentiated understanding of how regional human activities affect the spatial distribution and numbers of animals within specific areas of interest is of great ecological importance. Estimating these effects from empirical data is challenging however, because human activities can affect animals in qualitatively different ways and on different spatial and temporal scales. In addition, spatio-temporal animal abundance is frequently influenced by factors intrinsic and extrinsic to the area of interest, potentially confounding impact studies, e.g., based on trends. C_LIO_LIIn this study, we synergistically combined regression and mechanistic modelling to separate these different influences. We first used partial differential equations to simulate various potential animal redistribution patterns affected by regional human activities. We then selected appropriate patterns as predictors in regression-based species distribution models, together with additional anthropogenic and natural covariates. The simultaneous consideration of large-scale (number-conserving) animal reorganisation, their regional loss or gain, and the influence of additional environmental covariates eventually allowed the generation of qualitative and quantitative estimates and predictions of human-induced changes. C_LIO_LIWe exemplarily applied our approach to investigate the current and future impact of increasing offshore wind farm (OWF) implementation in the German North Sea on common murres (Uria aalge) during autumn. OWFs constructed up to 2019 reduced common murre numbers in German waters by 18.3%. If the planned OWF priority and reservation areas outlined in the German Marine Spatial Plan are implemented, the predicted loss would increase to 77.7%. Notably, these predictions did not include additional anthropogenic activities or further plans for OWF installation, which could together lead to the almost complete disappearance of common murres from the German North Sea. C_LIO_LIBy directly comparing predicted animal numbers and distributions in hypothetical scenarios with and without human pressures, the presented method allows us to measure and predict the effects of human activities on regional trends and large-scale reorganisation. This in turn helps us to quantify and predict the impact of planned human activities on wildlife, including in the context of the current rapid expansion of alternative energies. C_LI
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 12th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Movement mechanisms explain current animal density patterns and predict their reorganization under global change
Robin Bauknecht, Will Rogers, … Walter Jetz·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2026
- Distribution of Critical Areas for Ecological Conservation in Multiple Scenarios ---- Emphasizing the Impact of Human Activities
- Predicting the distribution of common wild mammal species across Europe - are there sufficient occurrence data?
Simon Croft, DA Warren, … GC Smith·European Journal of Wildlife ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2025
- Towns and Trails Drive Carnivore Connectivity using a Step Selection Approach
J. Whittington, R. Baron, … J. Paczkowski·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2021
- Predicting animal movement across the species range for landscape-scale applications
Kayleigh Chalkowski, Alexandra Sack, … Kim M. Pepin·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2025
- Prospective modelling of operational offshore windfarms on the distribution of marine megafauna in the southern North Sea
A. Virgili, S. Laran, … J. Spitz·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2020