Metabolic differences and differentially expressed genes between C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mice substrains
Abstract
C57BL/6J (B6J) and C57BL/6N (B6N) mice are the most frequently used substrains in C57BL/6 (B6) inbred mice, serving as physiological models for in vivo studies and as background strains to build transgenic mice. However, little attention has been paid to the phenotypic differences between B6J and B6N mice, and they have often been attributed to mutations in the nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt) gene, which was found only in B6J. Nevertheless, phenotypic differences between the two that cannot be explained by Nnt mutations alone, especially in metabolic traits, indicate the presence of genetic variants associated with metabolism other than Nnt. We aimed to identify these genetic differences between B6J and B6N mice. Our results provide insights into differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in adipose tissues, skeletal muscle, liver, hypothalamus, and hippocampus, and phenotypic differences in metabolic traits between B6J and B6N. B6J mice had significantly lower body weight than B6N mice, regardless of a normal or high-fat diet. Blood insulin levels in B6J mice were significantly lower than those in B6N mice and glucose levels during dietary obesity were higher in B6J mice. Metabolic assessments revealed greater physical activity, less food intake, and higher energy expenditure in B6J mice than in B6N mice. Among the DEGs that were highly expressed in B6J mice compared to B6N mice, three genes--insulin degrading enzyme, adenylosuccinate synthase 2, and ectonucleotide triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 4--and the DEGs that had lower expression in B6J mice compared to B6N mice--Nnt, WD repeat and FYVE domain containing 1, and dynein light chain Tctex-type 1--were overlapped in all seven tissues. Our study provides insights into DEGs between B6J and B6N, which will be useful for substrain selection for mouse experiments, avoiding erroneous experimental results, and reviewing the results of studies that have used B6J, B6N, or mixed substrains.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 44
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How stra(i)nge are your controls? A comparative analysis of metabolic phenotypes in commonly used C57 substrains
A. Sil, M. Souza Matos, … B. Platt·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2023
- Macronutrient Composition and Genetic Background Determine the Response to a Ketogenic Diet
Zhaoyue Zhang, Alexandre Moura‐Assis, … Jeffrey M. Friedman·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2026
- The regulation of liver gene expression by carbohydrates is mouse strain specific
Yuling Chi, Dou Yeon Youn, … Jeffrey E. Pessin·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2020
- Genetic Analysis of Substrain Divergence in NOD Mice
Petr Simecek, Gary A Churchill, … Edward H Leiter·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2015
- Modeling metabolic disease susceptibility and resilience in genetically diverse mice
Candice N. Baker, Jeffrey M. Harder, … Gary A. Churchill·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2025
- A propensity to hyperinsulinaemia underpins diet-induced diabetes in NODk mice
Matthew F. Waters, Ainy Hussain Hussain, … Christopher James Nolan·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2026