bioRxivMicrobiologyPreprint
Hierarchical control of bacterial growth efficiency by substrate and taxonomy
Abstract
Heterotrophic bacteria utilize organic carbon as a source of energy and material for growth. The balanced allocation of carbon between these two processes, termed growth efficiency, is a key physiological property of microbes because it links energy and biomass production, and determines the fraction of carbon lost as CO2. However, we do not understand what controls growth efficiency in microbes or how it correlates with taxonomy and resource identity. Here, we develop a quantitative high-throughput method for measuring CO2 production during bacterial growth. For 23 bacterial strains spanning three phyla, grown on two carbon substrates, we quantify growth efficiency by measuring dynamic CO2 production and carbon accumulation in biomass. Intra-phylum comparisons show that glycolytic substrates yield higher efficiency growth (less CO2 produced per biomass carbon) than gluconeogenic substrates. However, growth efficiency varies as much across resources as it does across phyla. A physiological model shows that variation in the growth efficiency depends on the ATP produced per respired CO2 and the ATP needed per biomass on a given substrate, suggesting phylum level differences in energy supply and demand dictate differences in growth efficiency. This theory predicts no global correlation between growth rate and growth efficiency, a finding our data support. Finally, we report phylum-level variation in the dynamics of CO2 production, which we link to the presence of overflow metabolism on glycolytic sub-strates. This study revises our understanding of how taxonomy and substrate identity impact carbon allocation during growth and sets the stage for understanding CO2 production in communities. SignificanceBacteria are responsible for roughly half of all biological CO2 production on the planet, much of it in soils. How organic carbon flows through microbial metabolism sets the rate at which soils return CO2 to the atmosphere. Bacterial growth efficiency, defined by the fraction of consumed carbon that is retained as biomass rather than released as CO2, determines the fluxes of carbon into the atmosphere. At present, we do not understand what controls growth efficiency in bacteria. We develop a new quantitative measurement of growth efficiency which we apply to 23 soil bacteria from three phyla on two substrates. We show that efficiency is structured hierarchically, at the highest level substrate identity defines efficiency which then varies substantially across taxa. So both the identity of species involved and the compounds they consume determine the rate of carbon loss.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: metabolomics
- research focus: metabolism & bioenergetics
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Trait-based approach to bacterial growth efficiency
M. E. Muscarella, X. M. Howey, J. T. Lennon·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2020
- Life history strategies and niches of soil bacteria emerge from interacting thermodynamic, biophysical, and metabolic traits
G. L. Marschmann, J. Tang, … E. L. Brodie·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2022
- Organizing principles in the nitrogen-carbon landscape of marine heterotrophic bacteria
Franziska Kratzl, Helen G. Scott, … Daniel Segrè·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2026
- Effects of substrate availability on growth and metabolism in soil microbes: Insights from theoretical modeling of studies of the Warburg effect and substrate-induced respiration
A. Swain, W. F. Fagan·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2020
- A Novel Method to Simultaneously Estimate Bacterial Respiration and Growth from Oxygen Dynamics
Ilgaz Cakin, Rebecca C. Millington, … Gabriel Yvon‐Durocher·ISME CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Bacterial biosynthetic efficiency is constrained by cell geometry and intracellular diffusion
Arianna Cylke, Indrajit Badvaram, Shiladitya Banerjee·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2026