Sign in

Abstract

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) constitutes a group of metastatic cancers in which standardized clinical investigations fail to identify a tissue of origin (TOO). Gene-expression profiling (GEP) has been used to resolve TOO, and DNA sequencing to identify potential targeted treatments; however, these methods have not been widely applied together in CUP patients. To assess the diagnostic utility of DNA and RNA tests for TOO classification, we applied GEP classification and/or gene-panel DNA sequencing in 215 CUP patients. Based on a retrospective review of pathology reports and clinical data, 77% of the cohort were deemed True-CUPs (T-CUP). Among the remaining cases, a latent primary diagnosis (10%) (LP-CUP) or TOO was highly suspected based on combined clinicopathological data (13%) (histology-resolved CUP, HR-CUP). High-medium confidence GEP classifications were made for 80% of LP/HR-CUPs, and these classifications were consistent with a pathologist-assigned diagnosis in 94% of cases, while only 56% of T-CUPs had high-medium confidence predictions. The frequency of somatic mutations in cancer genes was similar to 2,785 CUPs from AACR GENIE Project. DNA features, GEP classification, and oncovirus detection assisted making a TOO diagnosis in 37% of T-CUPs. Gene mutations and mutational signatures of diagnostic utility were found in 31% T-CUPs. GEP classification was useful in 13% of cases and viral detection in 4%. Among resolved T-CUPs, lung and biliary were the most frequently identified cancer types, while kidney cancer represented another minor subset. Multivariate survival analysis showed that unresolved T-CUPs had poorer overall survival than LP/HR-CUPs (Hazard ratio=1.9, 95% CI 1.1 - 3.2, p=0.016), while the risk of death was similar in genomically-resolved T-CUPs and LP/HR-CUPs. In conclusion, combining DNA and RNA profiling with clinicopathological data supported a putative TOO diagnosis in over a third of T-CUPs. DNA sequencing benefited T-CUP tumors with atypical transcriptional patterns that hindered reliable GEP classification.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLöptien '26Moon '22Nguyen '22Laprovitera '21Peng '20Raghu '24
74% semantic matchCancer Biology
Jana Löptien, Maximilian Haas, Maria Pouyiourou+12 more·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2026