Threatened bat species reduce their activity in presence of traffic noise playback, and may shout louder
Alisha HartiD, Patrick K. MonariiD, Kerry M. BorkiniD, Kristal Elaine CainiD, Tim Prebble, Ellen CieraadiD, David E. PattemoreiD
Abstract
Anthropogenic sound is a prevalent pollutant with broad effects on wildlife. As human populations grow, exposure of natural environments to anthropogenic noise will increase. Automobile traffic is a notably pervasive source of noise pollution; transportation networks often cross otherwise relatively undisturbed habitats and the sound they produce is typically chronic and of high intensity. How this noise interferes with the production and reception of animal acoustic signals for communication and navigation remains largely unknown. In particular, bats (order Chiroptera) have received limited attention in anthropogenic noise studies, despite being the second most diverse mammalian group and relying strongly on acoustic signals. We used a phantom road paradigm to experimentally isolate and assess the effect of traffic sound playback on the behaviour of the two extant bat species in Aotearoa New Zealand. To begin to understand how bats might behaviourally respond to a noisy environment, we also investigated whether bats call sequence and structure differed with and without sound playback. We found an approximate 50% reduction in the mean number of sequences per night of both bat species during sound playback, suggesting bats avoid noisy areas. We also found that calls from the bats that were present were emitted at higher frequencies and increased intensities (loudness) during playback. As avoidance of areas reduces the amount of quality habitat accessible and call modulation can impose metabolic costs, chronic noise may impose fitness costs on declining populations of native bats. With increasing areas of natural habitat exposed to anthropogenic noise, untangling the effects of high sound levels is crucial for conservation of bats and the ecosystem services they provide.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bats adjust temporal features of echolocation calls but not those of communication calls in response to traffic noise
Shengjing Song, Aiqing Lin, … Jiang Feng·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2018
- Individual differences show that only some bats can cope with noise-induced masking and distraction.
D. G. E. Gomes, H. R. Goerlitz·bioRxiv·Jul 4, 2020
- Sounds of silence: electric mobility promises a quieter soundscape for wildlife, but may challenge ultrasonically sensitive species globally
Baheerathan Murugavel, Manjari Jain, Oliver Lindecke·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2025
- Flexible control of vocal timing in Carollia perspicillata bats enables escape from acoustic interference
A. Kiai, J. Clemens, … J. C. Hechavarria·bioRxiv·May 9, 2023
- Swainson's thrushes vary song structure and singing behavior across ambient noise gradients and rapidly adjust songs in response to experimental traffic noise
Brigitta Mathews, Riley Crawford, … Christopher N. Templeton·Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2026
- Anthropogenic noise affects vocalisation properties of the territorial song of Western Australian magpies
Grace Blackburn, Mylène Dutour, … Amanda R. Ridley·IbisPeer-reviewed·Jun 8, 2025