In vitro pathogenicity evaluation of deep intronic variants for recessive genetic retinal diseases
Marianna E. WeeneriD, Kevin Valestil, Emily PlaceiD, Sudeep MehrotraiD, Daniel Navarro, Hilary Scott, Kinga M. BujakowskaiD, Eric A. PierceiD
Abstract
Non-coding variants altering mRNA splicing are increasingly recognized as important cause of Mendelian disorders. Deep intronic variants (DIV) that activate cryptic exons (CEs) cause ~20% inherited retinal diseases (IRD) cases, yet it remains challenging to predict intronic variant pathogenicity accurately, thus we used a high throughput splicing assay (HTSA) to measure the effects of rare deep intronic variants in recessive IRDs with one confirmed pathogenic variant. 640 very rare deep intronic variants were chosen in trans-position with known mutation from 76 patients. We tested them with HTSA, which consists of a split-GFP minigene, separated by an SMN1 gene intron into which the 270bp sequences flanking the DIVs were cloned. The plasmid library was transfected into 293HEK cells, and 48 hours later total RNA was extracted from the transfected cells. RNA transcripts produced by HTSA minigene were amplified by RT-PCR and sequenced. The intron sequences spliced between the two GFP exons were identified and quantified. 98 variants activated CE >100 times more in altered oligo compared to reference oligo and were classified as pathogenic in this experimental setting, validated in longer context, 26 variants were classified as VUS. Interestingly, only 6 from 90 variants (6,6%) were predicted to be pathogenic by in silico algorithms (Splice AI) which leaves room for significant improvement of prediction algorithms. The results of this experiment confirmed diagnosis for 50 of 78 patients (64%). So, 19,4% of deep intronic variants were shown to cause CE activation. This can lead to conclusion that significant portion of undiagnosed patients with recessive IRDs carry pathogenic intronic mutation which causes the disease.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- PDIVAS: Pathogenicity predictor for Deep-Intronic Variants causing Aberrant Splicing
Ryo Kurosawa, Kei Iida, … Masatoshi Hagiwara·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2023
- A high throughput splicing assay to investigate the effect of variants of unknown significance on exon inclusion
Hilary A. Scott, Emily Place, … Kinga M. Bujakowska·medRxiv·Nov 30, 2022
- Mapping intronic mutational hotspots by in silico mutagenesis enables single antisense oligonucleotide correction of multiple variants
Hassan Saei, Béatrice Ardin, … Guillaume Dorval·medRxiv·Sep 15, 2026
- Deep-intronic variants in USH2A: the importance of model selection in variant interpretation and pathogenicity assessment
Kim Rodenburg, Renske T.W. Schellens, … Erwin van Wijk·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2026
- Genome sequencing reveals novel pathogenic deep-intronic PCDH15 variants, amenable to antisense oligonucleotide-based splice correction
Kim Rodenburg, Leony Fenwick, … Erwin van Wijk·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2026
- Revision of splicing variants in the DMD gene
Kseniya Davydenko, Alexandra Yu. Filatova, Mikhail Y. Skoblov·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2024