bioRxivMicrobiologyPreprint
Superior performance of human wastewater-associated viral markers compared to bacterial markers in tropical environments
W. Sangkaew, A. Kongprajug, N. Chyerochana, W. Ahmed, S. Mongkolsuk, K. Sirikanchana
Abstract
Identifying human sewage contamination via microbial source tracking (MST) marker genes has proven useful for effective water quality management worldwide; however, performance evaluations for these genes in tropical areas are limited. Therefore, this research assessed four human-associated MST marker genes in aquatic environments of Central Thailand: human polyomaviruses (JC and BK viruses [HPyVs]), bacteriophage crAssphage (CPQ_056), Lachnospiraceae Lachno3, and Bacteroides BacV6-21. HPyV and crAssphage assays were highly sensitive and specific to sewage (n = 19), with no cross-detection in 120 swine, cattle, chicken, duck, goat, sheep, and buffalo composite fecal samples. Lachno3 and BacV6-21 demonstrated high sensitivity but moderate specificity; however, using both markers could improve specificity to >0.80 (max value of 1.00). The most abundant markers in sewage were Lachno3 and BacV6-21 (5.42-8.02 and non-detected-8.05 log10 copies/100 mL), crAssphage (5.28-7.38 log10 copies/100 mL), and HPyVs (3.66-6.53 log10 copies/100 mL), respectively. HPyVs showed higher levels (up to 4.33 log10 copies/100 mL) and higher detection rates (92.7%) in two coastal beaches (n = 41) than crAssphage (up to 3.51 log10 copies/100 mL and 56.1%). HPyVs were also found at slightly lower levels (up to 5.10 log10 copies/100 mL), but at higher detection rates (92.6%), in a freshwater canal (n = 27) than crAssphage (up to 5.21 log10 copies/100 mL and 88.9%). Overall, both HPyVs and crAssphage are suggested as human sewage-associated MST markers in aquatic environments of Central Thailand. This study underlines the importance of characterizing and validating MST markers in host groups and environmental waters before including them in a water quality management toolbox.
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Tomato brown rugose fruit virus Mo gene is a novel microbial source tracking marker
A. Natarajan, B. J. Fremin, … A. B. Boehm·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2023
- Implementation and Integration of Microbial Source Tracking in a River Watershed Monitoring Plan
E. Balleste, K. Demeter, … W. G. Meijer·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2019
- A High-Throughput Microfluidic Quantitative PCR Platform for the Simultaneous Quantification of Pathogens, Fecal Indicator Bacteria, and Microbial Source Tracking Markers
E. R. Hill, C. Chun, … S. Ishii·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2023
- Using Watershed Characteristics for Improving Fecal Source Identification
J. J. Hart, M. N. Jamison, … R. R. Rediske·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2022
- A Novel Droplet Digital PCR Human mtDNA Assay for Global Fecal Source Tracking
K. Zhu, B. Suttner, … J. Brown·Water ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2020
- Microbial source tracking of human and animal fecal contamination in Ecuadorian households
Kelsey J. Jesser, Viviana Albán, … Karen Lévy·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2025