bioRxivCell BiologyPreprint
FIXATION MATTERS: MULTIDIMENSIONAL EFFECTS OF CHEMICAL PREPARATION ON MORPHOLOGY AND SURFACE TEXTURE OF EXTREMOPHILIC BACTERIA
Abstract
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is widely used to investigate bacterial surface architecture; however, sample preparation protocols may introduce structural artefacts that compromise the interpretation of morphometric and ultrastructural features. This issue becomes especially relevant for extremophilic microorganisms, whose specialized cell envelopes may respond differently to chemical fixation. In this study, we evaluated the effects of two aldehyde-based fixation protocols, 2.5% glutaraldehyde and Karnovskys solution, combined with different fixation times (1, 3, and 24 h) and the presence or absence of osmium tetroxide (OsO4) post-fixation, on three Gram-positive bacterial strains: the polyextremophiles Exiguobacterium sp. S17 and Nesterenkonia sp. Act20, and the mesophile Kocuria rosea CH-021. Morphological preservation was assessed using morphometric parameters, including cellular area and surface-to-volume ratio, together with texture analysis based on Haralick descriptors derived from grey-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM). Results showed that fixation conditions significantly affected morphometric and textural features in a strain-dependent manner. Although overall morphology appeared preserved, quantitative analyses revealed marked differences in surface texture and structural integrity among treatments. Osmium tetroxide modified morphometric and textural parameters, although its effects varied among strains and fixation conditions. These findings highlight the importance of integrated quantitative approaches combining cellular geometry and surface texture analysis for the evaluation of SEM preparation protocols in structurally specialized microorganisms.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: microscopy & imaging analysis
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Structure-preserving fixation allows Scanning Electron Microscopy to reveal biofilm microstructure and interactions with immune cells
M. J. Wells, M. Mikesh, V. D. Gordon·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2023
- Imaging live bacteria at the nanoscale: comparison of immobilisation strategies
G. Benn, A. Pyne, … B. Hoogenboom·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2019
- Ultra-structural analysis of mineralized extracellular matrix in osteogenic monolayers and spheroids: comparison of sample preparation methods
Diamante Boscaro, Ursula Ludacka, Pawel Sikorski·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2026
- Comparison of Escherichia coli surface attachment methods for single-cell, in vivo microscopy
Yao‐Kuan Wang, Ekaterina Krasnopeeva, … Chien‐Jung Lo·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2019
- Ultrastructural comparison of fixation and cryopreservation methods for brain preservation
Alexander German, Cassandra Flügel‐Koch, … Andrew Thomas McKenzie·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- Effects of biological fixation methods on stimulated Raman scattering microscopy signal
Chiara Ceconello, Leon Han, … Aaron Streets·Advanced Chemical Microscopy for Life Science and Translational MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2026