bioRxivMicrobiology
Multi-omics analyses from a single sample: Prior metabolite extraction does not alter the 16S rRNA-based characterization of prokaryotic community in a diversity of sample types
S. Duperron, P. Foucault, C. Duval, M. Goto, A. Gallet, S. Colas, B. Marie
Abstract
Massive sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene has become a standard first step to describe and compare microbial communities from various samples. Parallel analysis of high numbers of samples makes it relevant to the statistical testing of the influence of natural or experimental factors and variables. However, these descriptions fail to document changes in community or ecosystem functioning. Non-targeted metabolomics are a suitable tool to bridge this gap, yet extractions protocols are different. In this study, prokaryotic community compositions are documented by 16S rRNA sequencing after direct DNA extraction, or after metabolites extraction followed by DNA extraction. Results obtained using the V3-V4 region on non-axenic cultures of cyanobacteria, lake water column, biofilm, gut of wild and lab-reared fish, indicate that prior extraction of metabolites does not influence the obtained image of prokaryotic communities. This validates sequential extraction of metabolites followed by DNA as a way to combine 16S rRNA sequencing with metabolome characterization from a single sample. This approach has the potential to complement community structure characterization with a proxy of their functioning, without the uncertainties associated with the use of separate samples.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: metagenomics
- assay: metabolomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A comparison of six DNA extraction protocols for 16S, ITS, and shotgun metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities
J. P. Shaffer, C. S. Carpenter, … R. Knight·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2022
- Comparing DNA Extraction Protocols for Freshwater Prokaryotic Communities: Impacts on Yield and Microbial Profiling
Arthur Szylit, Ludwig E. Jardillier, … Urania Christaki·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2026
- From Microscale to Microbial Insights: Validating High-Throughput Microvolume Extraction Methods (HiMEx) for Microbial Ecology
Marjan Ghotbi, Mitra Ghotbi, … David M. Needham·ISME CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Improved microbial community characterization of 16S rRNA via metagenome hybridization capture enrichment
M. S. Beaudry, J. Wang, … T. C. Glenn·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2020
- Comparison of microbial communities from diverse biological matrices using mock community as an in situ positive control
G. Galla, N. Praeg, … H. C. Hauffe·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2022
- Sediment-associated microbial community profiling: sample pre-processing through sequential membrane filtration for 16s rDNA amplicon sequencing
J. M. Serrana, K. Watanabe·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2020