A comparison of six DNA extraction protocols for 16S, ITS, and shotgun metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities
J. P. Shaffer, C. S. Carpenter, C. P. Martino, R. A. Salido, M. Bryant, K. Sanders, T. Schwartz, G. Humphrey, A. D. Swafford, R. Knight
Abstract
Microbial communities contain a broad phylogenetic diversity of organisms, however the majority of methods center on describing bacteria and archaea. Fungi are important symbionts in many ecosystems, and are potentially important members of the human microbiome, beyond those that can cause disease. To expand our analysis of microbial communities to include fungal ITS data, we compared five candidate DNA extraction kits against our standardized protocol for describing bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene amplicon- and shotgun metagenomics sequencing. We present results considering a diverse panel of host-associated and environmental sample types, and comparing the cost, processing time, well-to-well contamination, DNA yield, limit of detection, and microbial community composition among protocols. Across all criteria, we found the MagMAX Microbiome kit to perform best. The PowerSoil Pro kit performed comparably, but with increased cost per sample and overall processing time. The Zymo MagBead, NucleoMag Food, and Norgen Stool kits were included. Accession numbersRaw sequence data were deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive (accession#: ERP124610) and raw and processed data are available at Qiita (Study ID: 12201). All processing and analysis code is available on GitHub (github.com/justinshaffer/Extraction_kit_testing). Methods summaryTo allow for downstream applications involving fungi in addition to bacteria and archaea, we compared five DNA extraction kits with our previously established, standardized protocol for extracting DNA for microbial community analysis. Across ten diverse sample types, we found one extraction kit to perform comparably or better than our standardized protocol. Our conclusion is based on per-sample comparisons of DNA yield, the number of quality-filtered sequences generated, the limit of detection of microbial cells, microbial community alpha-diversity, beta-diversity, and taxonomic composition, and extent of well-to-well contamination.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for whole metagenome sequencing of human oral, vaginal, and rectal microbiome samples
M. L. Wright, J. Podnar, … D. Wylie·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2023
- Impact of Sample Type and DNA Isolation Procedure on Genomic Inference of Microbiome Composition
Berith E Knudsen, Lasse Bergmark, … Sunje J Pamp·mSystemsPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2016
- Comparing DNA Extraction Protocols for Freshwater Prokaryotic Communities: Impacts on Yield and Microbial Profiling
Arthur Szylit, Ludwig E. Jardillier, … Urania Christaki·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2026
- High-throughput DNA extraction and cost-effective miniaturized metagenome and amplicon library preparation of soil samples for DNA sequencing
T. B. N. Jensen, S. M. Dall, … M. Albertsen·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2023
- Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling
A. L. Ackerman, J. T. Anger, … Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Pelvic Pain (MAPP)·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2018
- Toward standards in clinical microbiome studies: comparison of three DNA extraction methods and two bioinformatic pipelines
Q. R. Ducarmon, B. B. V. H. Hornung, … R. D. Zwittink·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2019